The wiki is the wiki ... aka anybody can edit it. You should likely not
be relying on it as primary source for legal advice for your company.

Specifically the page in question has a header that reads:

"This wiki page was used for discussion and development of the move to
the Open Database License. It is not legal advice, and is likely to be
inaccurate or incomplete. Please do not use this page as a reference for
what you can or can't do."

That is meant seriously.

Please have a look at
http://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/License/Community_Guidelines for
current clarifications and guidelines (likely horizontal layers and
trivial transformations).

While I'm sure cloud storage providers would love us to do so, we do not
require essentially unmodified extracted OSM data to be provided separately.

Simon

Am 20.04.2015 um 23:34 schrieb Carey, Dan:
> I've read the section here:
> 
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Open_Data_License/Use_Cases#Embedding_OSM_data_into_other_products.2Fapplications
> 
> and the response: "OK as long as the games company also provides an offer of 
> the open derivative DB free from technical measures in parallel (see Section 
> 4.8b). Otherwise, its explicitly disallowed."
> 
> My use case is very similar to the linked example as my product is very 
> similar to a video game. My confusion is what "open derivative DB" and "free 
> from technical measures" means in my situation.
> 
> My use case is the following:
> 
> 1. Selectively import OSM derived vector files for geographic map area.
> 2. Import other raster source data for elevation, 3rd party vectors, models, 
> etc.
> 3. "Massage" source data, fixing collisions, artifacts.
> 3. Use rendering software to create a 3D terrain using all imported data.
> 4. Process the 3D terrain to extract proprietary formatted data that runs in 
> a publicly sold application.
> 
> My questions are:
> 
> 1. What is the "open derivative DB free from technical measures " in my case 
> above?
> 2. Besides offering the "open derivative DB", and acknowledging OSM as a 
> source, are there any other restrictions on selling the final proprietary 
> format?
> 
> Thank you for your time,
> Dan
> 
> 
> 
> The information contained in this email message, including any attachments, is
> for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and
> privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or 
> distribution
> is prohibited.  If you are not the intended recipient and have received this
> communication in error, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy 
> all
> copies of the original message.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> legal-talk mailing list
> legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk

Reply via email to