I agree that there's no harm in sending another email asking for assent to
more specific terms. I've drafted some suggested language, to make this
easy.
Having recently spoken to a number of parties about Australia's open data
push (specifically address data), including folks from the PM's office
On 11 December 2015 at 21:04, Andrew Harvey wrote:
> Talking with their legal people it was, or at least as far as I
> understood them, their view that the the ODbL style of attribution
> (where downstream don't need to provide attribution for any
> incorporated or derived datasets) is fine within
