On 22 December 2015 at 03:48, Tom Lee wrote:
> Point 1 is simple agreement.
>
> Point 2 also seems fine (obviously it's impossible to anticipate every
> possible future for OSM, but an attribution-free one seems about as unlikely
> as any).
>
> Point 3 is the least appealing, but I would personall
Point 1 is simple agreement.
Point 2 also seems fine (obviously it's impossible to anticipate every
possible future for OSM, but an attribution-free one seems about as
unlikely as any).
Point 3 is the least appealing, but I would personally feel comfortable
proceeding under the assumption that "i
