Am Mi, 29.06.2016, 23:46 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
> Is there still need to attribute the original creator?
In my opinion that's what CC-BY is all about. You're allowed to change
it, but you still need to tell the name of the licensee.
It's common GIS practice:
When you've got data from
sent from a phone
> Il giorno 29 giu 2016, alle ore 23:26, Tobias Wendorff
> ha scritto:
>
> Oh come on, that's no valid argument. A script can handle this and
> output the source of the data imported into this area. Nobody would
> need to analyse the data on
Am Mi, 29.06.2016, 22:58 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
>
> just that this list becomes very long, see
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contributors
You wouldn't see "data.gov.au" in a German map extract of course.
I just wasn't creative enough to add data from one spatial area :)
"(C)
sent from a phone
> Il giorno 29 giu 2016, alle ore 22:49, Tobias Wendorff
> ha scritto:
>
> "(C) OpenStreetMap, with subsets of data.gov.au, BKG Germany & xyz"
just that this list becomes very long, see
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contributors
Am Di, 28.06.2016, 12:51 schrieb Simon Poole:
> We cannot restrict how our data is used outside of the
> ODbL terms. While we might not be adding personal information,
> downstream that may well happen.
Let's change ODbL and allow different BY-attributes. That would solve
much of problems.
Thanks for that advice. I will draft an email over the next
couple of days.
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016, at 08:51 PM, Simon Poole wrote:
> The explicit permission that we received was for data released
> directly by the Australian government, it is unclear if that could
> apply to data that they