Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Australian Government Data from data.gov.au

2016-06-29 Thread Tobias Wendorff
Am Mi, 29.06.2016, 23:46 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer: > Is there still need to attribute the original creator? In my opinion that's what CC-BY is all about. You're allowed to change it, but you still need to tell the name of the licensee. It's common GIS practice: When you've got data from

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Australian Government Data from data.gov.au

2016-06-29 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > Il giorno 29 giu 2016, alle ore 23:26, Tobias Wendorff > ha scritto: > > Oh come on, that's no valid argument. A script can handle this and > output the source of the data imported into this area. Nobody would > need to analyse the data on

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Australian Government Data from data.gov.au

2016-06-29 Thread Tobias Wendorff
Am Mi, 29.06.2016, 22:58 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer: > > just that this list becomes very long, see > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contributors You wouldn't see "data.gov.au" in a German map extract of course. I just wasn't creative enough to add data from one spatial area :) "(C)

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Australian Government Data from data.gov.au

2016-06-29 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > Il giorno 29 giu 2016, alle ore 22:49, Tobias Wendorff > ha scritto: > > "(C) OpenStreetMap, with subsets of data.gov.au, BKG Germany & xyz" just that this list becomes very long, see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contributors

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Australian Government Data from data.gov.au

2016-06-29 Thread Tobias Wendorff
Am Di, 28.06.2016, 12:51 schrieb Simon Poole: > We cannot restrict how our data is used outside of the > ODbL terms. While we might not be adding personal information, > downstream that may well happen. Let's change ODbL and allow different BY-attributes. That would solve much of problems.

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Australian Government Data from data.gov.au

2016-06-29 Thread cleary
Thanks for that advice. I will draft an email over the next couple of days. On Tue, Jun 28, 2016, at 08:51 PM, Simon Poole wrote: > The explicit permission that we received was for data released > directly by the Australian government, it is unclear if that could > apply to data that they