Hi,
On 04/25/2017 01:38 AM, 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson wrote:
> What do you folks think about
> http://data.gov.tw/license#eng ?
> Can we use that data?
Not without further clarification. The way in which we would use the
data could be seen as violating their 3.2: "[The user] must make an
explicit notice o
Hi Dan,
The English version, at least, appears less restrictive than CC BY 4.0, and
closer to the Canada Open Government License. The license is not specific
as to the type of attribution required.
The conservative route, is, as Frederik said, to ask the agency if
attribution on the osm.org/copyrig
Hi Blake,
Sorry for dropping this thread. Which generic waiver exactly are you
referring to?
The purpose of these templates is for data providers who are concerned
about attribution being provided properly. It may be that some providers do
not care, in which case a less specific waiver may work.
Be
As a general concern, yes, having nailed down how we attribute on the
website is a bit of a pain and from a practical view will require that
we provide the links indefinitely. And yes references to the ODbL and/or
a specific version of it (including importing ODbL data) in an agreement
could potent