On Saturday 13 January 2018, Paul Norman wrote:
>
> Has anyone requested the derivative database their produced work is
> based on? It'd give us their interpretation.
As said i have contacted the author (primarily regarding attribution -
which he promised to improve - and has partly already
On 1/11/2018 7:30 AM, Christoph Hormann wrote:
My interpretation of the ODbL here is that this is a share-alike case
that would require the combined data sources to be made available. But
you could probably also look at it differently. I would like to hear
opinions on this. In particular if
On Saturday 13 January 2018, Kathleen Lu wrote:
> Your example doesn't work. Even if you could render
> "distance-to-water"
>
> this way, you wouldn't get a set proprietary data based lakes + OSM
> lakes, you would get a visualization of one massive complicated body
> of water that included all
