Re: [OSM-legal-talk] use OSM data to select proprietary data

2019-12-14 Thread Christoph Hormann
On Saturday 14 December 2019, matthias.straetl...@buerotiger.de wrote: > > existing OSMF community guidelines suggest spatial operations like > > ST_Difference() and ST_Intersection() yield Derivative Databases > > that are subject to share-alike. > > Let's take the Collective Database Guideline,

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] use OSM data to select proprietary data

2019-12-14 Thread matthias . straetling
> > existing OSMF community guidelines suggest spatial operations like > ST_Difference() and ST_Intersection() yield Derivative Databases that > are subject to share-alike. Let's take the Collective Database Guideline, you've mentioned:

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] use OSM data to select proprietary data

2019-12-14 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, On 14.12.19 06:41, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > Can you point me to legal definition > of "substantial part"? There is none, hence: https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Community_Guidelines/Substantial_-_Guideline Bye Frederik -- Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ##

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] use OSM data to select proprietary data

2019-12-14 Thread Robert Whittaker (OSM lists)
On Thu, 12 Dec 2019 22:41 Kathleen Lu via legal-talk, < legal-talk@openstreetmap.org> wrote: > No, ODbL does not apply to any database that does not include OSM data. > There are two reasons. > I would argue that the dataset here does include some OSM data, as it includes (albeit limited)