Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Private negotiations.

2011-06-09 Thread Nakor Osm
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Rob Myers wrote: > On 09/06/11 18:18, Nakor Osm wrote: > >> >> This is wrong: remove the CTs and leave the database licensed as it is >> today and no data needs to be removed. >> > > The license today has problems. Both the li

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Private negotiations.

2011-06-09 Thread Nakor Osm
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 8:10 AM, Nick Hocking wrote: > > > Without them, as we are now seeing, collaborative mapping is not possible. > > > This is wrong: remove the CTs and leave the database licensed as it is today and no data needs to be removed. ___

[OSM-legal-talk] Remapping before license change (was Re: CTs are not full copyright assignment)

2011-06-07 Thread Nakor Osm
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 4:08 AM, Frederik Ramm wrote: > > We're planning to have most things remapped by CT supporters before we make > the switch, so it will hardly be noticeable. > > >> >> How do you plan to achieve that in areas where there are not (m)any mappers on the ground? Not everything c