Re: [OSM-legal-talk] CC-BY-SA and derivate works

2010-06-08 Thread Phil Monger
Alex, I wouldn't worry too much about this. You simply state that the mapping (including any derivative elements) is CC-By-SA. Anything you have added to the map that is not derivative or based on it (i.e. your Logo) remains (C). If anyone wants to actually scan that map, and try to sell

[OSM-legal-talk] Potential huge License violation - anyone know anything about this?

2010-06-02 Thread Phil Monger
So I was looking through some cycle books, as you do, when I came across this one (i've hosted the images 3rd party and avoided HTML, if they don't work let me know. I had to snap them on the iPhone - so sorry for the lack of a close focus!!) : http://img249.imageshack.us/i/img0002tw.jpg/ It's a

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Potential huge License violation - anyone know anything about this?

2010-06-02 Thread Phil Monger
to give something back by making their re-use re-useable? Or am I just tilting at windmills? Phil On 2 June 2010 21:58, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote: Phil, Phil Monger wrote: It's a new cycle book for London, with routes, etc. Pretty standard fare. The problem? All the maps inside

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Potential huge License violation - anyone know anything about this?

2010-06-02 Thread Phil Monger
, Phil Monger wrote: This is entirely derivative. The maps and route descriptions operate together as *one piece of work* - indeed descriptions of the ways, place names, distances, directions (ect) used in *the text* are taken from *the mapping*. The text couldn't / wouldn't