On 10.04.19 16:39, Tom Lee via legal-talk wrote:
I have sometimes sene[sic] similar arguments about intellectual property
brought up in engineering-focused conversations, which propose elaborate
technical mechanisms by which data might be transformed, then recreated,
> and in the process its
On 07/06/18 00:44, Kathleen Lu wrote:
The way I understand the use, the OSM data is used to identify areas
that are to be discarded. Data in those areas are discarded. Thus, the
OSM data is not kept either, and no OSM data in the final dataset. Thus,
there is no derivative database containing
As near as I can see, the only data they are distributing (publicly) is
the 2 GeoTIFF files in the "map.ox.ac.uk" page. The question is: Is a
GeoTIFF file created like this from OSM data which has been mixed with
other data, a Produced Work, or a Derived Database?
In support of "Produced Work",
Hi all,
The wiki page on ODbL combatibility[1] says, for CC-BY 4.0: "status of
CC-BY 4.0 is still under consideration by the LWG". Is there any update
on this consideration?
There's the obvious attribution requirment with all CC-BY licences,
leaving that aside, my reading of the legal-talk@
On 06/09/16 15:13, Tobias Wendorff wrote:
> Actually, these vector formats are modified SQLite databases
Not really. Vector tiles (*.mvt) are protobuf files, not sqlite files
(you might be thinking of mbtiles). It doesn't really matter for your
example, since you could filter a mvt file to split
