Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Digitizing from Balloon Maps

2012-03-16 Thread Tim Waters
>From what I recall, but this is not canon (insert disqualification etc) Ed Parsons from Google has basically said in one of his personal blog posts in 2008 [1] that interpreting the location of a point to create a new bit of data using their aerial imagery does not make it derived data, because th

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] PublicEarth and their Terms of Use

2009-11-18 Thread Tim Waters
2009/11/18 Jukka Rahkonen : > Hi, > > Somebody might get interested in having a look at the business idea of > PublicEarth and their Terms of Use. I feel they won't get very many > places from me. > http://publicearth.com/ > http://publicearth.com/terms > Then there's the nice issue of making a da

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] OGC Geospatial Rights Management Summit

2009-06-11 Thread Tim Waters (chippy)
I find the idea of DRM being used to help ensure and enforce copy-left to be quite interesting. (But doubt this conference will cover that) On Jun 9, 2009 6:31 AM, "SteveC" wrote: I could in theory make it, and I even considered it for about 10 seconds... but I couldn't think what I'd get out of

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] License License License

2008-10-13 Thread Tim Waters (chippy)
On 10/13/08, Frederik Ramm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Suppose I am a statistics wizard. I take the planet file and run it > through any number of processing steps, using a lot of my proprietary > knowledge and experience and algorithms I have created and whatnot, > to produce interesting eval

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Paid services from OSM

2008-10-12 Thread Tim Waters (chippy)
On 10/11/08, Richard Fairhurst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Simon Ward wrote: > > > _I_ think this discussion is healthy, and will give people ideas on > > what > > to look out for when the licence is released. > > > Sure, I wouldn't dispute that it's healthy. I would just observe that > percei

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Paid services from OSM

2008-10-08 Thread Tim Waters (chippy)
On 10/8/08, Iván Sánchez Ortega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > El Miércoles, 8 de Octubre de 2008, Sunburned Surveyor escribió: > > What are you required to release? > > > *Nothing*. > > Please keep in mind that the ODbL (or CC-by-sa, for that matter) does not > *require* you to release anything.

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Paid services from OSM

2008-10-08 Thread Tim Waters (chippy)
Interesting post Peter, this has clarified something for me - please correct me if I'm wrong. With the new licence - any derivative work produced would require that the data used to create it is distributed. Also, any derivative work has to include two notices, 1) saying that it is using OSM data,

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Tracing from Aerial Imagery

2008-08-22 Thread Tim Waters (chippy)
a recording (over 3 youtube videos) of Ed Parsons & Mapmaker can be found here: http://www.youtube.com/user/ikiyamaps On 8/1/08, SteveC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Has the recording of that session been made live? > > > > On 31 Jul 2008, at 17:14, Frederik Ramm wrote: > > > Hi, > > > >t