Ian Haylock wrote:
> Surely if a person releases something under PD, he/she is giving up
> all rights to that information, be it software, data, etc.
> So what's to stop OSM doing what they want with the data.
>
> For instance if the whole of the OSM database was public domain. A
> private c
Hi,
> > This sounds like a nightmare: I could lose weeks of work because
> > someone who fails to reply played with Potlatch once for a few
> > minutes and then vanished.
>
> You have a better idea? :-)
Well if push comes to shove then in order to have a say about an
element in our database,
On 4 Feb 2008, at 13:46, David Earl wrote:
>>> how do we avoid the situation where e.g. someone who disagrees the
>>> new license has run a bot over all of Cambridge to tweak things
>>> (as has indeed
>>> happened to many of the ways) or who has 'tidied up' bits of my
>>> mapping so all my s
On 4 Feb 2008, at 13:24, David Earl wrote:
> On 04/02/2008 10:41, SteveC wrote:
>> • Stage 4 - Remove all data from those who do not respond or
>> respond negatively (the hard bit)
>
> Steve,
First, as the email said twice, please don't cc talk.
> how do we avoid the situation where e.g
