Am 15.01.2013 18:02, schrieb Alex Barth:
On Jan 14, 2013, at 5:30 AM, Simon Poole si...@poole.ch wrote:
Am 14.01.2013 08:36, schrieb Kate Chapman:
2. I have a spreadsheet of hospital locations licensed CC-BY-NC, I use
OSM to geocode these locations. I believe this can't happen because of
Hi Martin,
I appreciate the sentiment, though I think it have unintended consequences.
The reason I am asking the questions I'm asking is as part of a
greater effort to advocate within humanitarian groups to release their
data under licenses compatible to OSM. Often the issue with data after
a
Alex,
While I agree with the principal that the restrictions on geocoding
are preventing groups from joining the OSM community, I don't think
changing the insubstantial clause is the way to fix the issue. The
clause is there for just that insubstantial use, to make it high
enough to allow
Am 14.01.2013 08:36, schrieb Kate Chapman:
1. I used OSM as the basemap for my map of refugee camps, the camp
data is my organizations and licensed CC BY-NC. The data for OSM and
the camp data is never combined. I release my map under CC-BY-NC. I
believe this is okay.
All IMHO naturally.
Thanks Simon,
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 6:30 PM, Simon Poole si...@poole.ch wrote:
Am 14.01.2013 08:36, schrieb Kate Chapman:
2. I have a spreadsheet of hospital locations licensed CC-BY-NC, I use
OSM to geocode these locations. I believe this can't happen because of
the incompatibility of
Hi All,
So I've been thinking a lot about non-commercial licenses. The reason
is there are many humanitarian organizations that are releasing data
CC BY-NC or CC BY-SA-NC. I've been thinking through the issues with
this and trying to improve HOT's points about why using NC licenses is
not
