Thank you, Jonathan
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 1:32 PM, Jonathan Harley wrote:
>
> Hi all, just a note to say that I've updated the Use Cases wiki page based
> on the comments below from Igor and others who replied to me earlier in the
> month.
>
> Michael - everyone who's commented about your re
Hi all, just a note to say that I've updated the Use Cases wiki page
based on the comments below from Igor and others who replied to me
earlier in the month.
Michael - everyone who's commented about your redrafted guideline has
agreed with it - maybe it's time to go ahead and replace what's
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 6:18 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
> 2012/11/5 David Groom :
>
> btw.: also removing might be of interest, e.g. someone checking "all"
> businesses in OSM and removing them in the case they are closed now
> would be a major improvement we would like to have fed back into OS
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Jonathan Harley wrote:
>
> Michael's reply to you about the "trivial transformation guideline" of 30
> October agrees with this - in his terms it provides no new "physical
> observations" and the intent of the license is to capture those for
> share-alike, not to e
Hi Jonathan,
I'm looking at the Case 2 (publish something based on OSM and nothing
else). I think we need a clarification on what the "unmodified OSM
database" means. For example: it's a common practice to simplify the line
and polygon artwork when producing SVGs or PDFs (to reduce the file size
a
Goal-oriented wiki page, first draft:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/License/Use_Cases
Some points deliberately simplified for readability. C&C welcome.
As I was going through all the ways one might make a derivative
database, it struck me that there's an obvious way of dodging this - to
