Re: [OSM-legal-talk] How Can OSMF convince me to accept the New CT and ODBL

2010-12-09 Thread Rob Myers
On 09/12/10 13:27, Ed Avis wrote: I've seen this point discussed many times before. The CT's do not transfer ownership. Technically this is true, Legally it is true. but the grant of rights is so broad ('any action restricted by copyright') and the limitations of 'any free and open licence

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] How Can OSMF convince me to accept the New CT and ODBL

2010-12-09 Thread Ed Avis
> I believe the question is whether the OSMF should have special rights which are not available to others. If you look again at the explanation of the OSMF's role: >>It is important to understand that the OpenStreetMap Foundation is not the >>same thing as the OpenStreetMap project. The Foundatio

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] How Can OSMF convince me to accept the New CT and ODBL

2010-12-08 Thread Francis Davey
On 8 December 2010 21:54, ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen wrote: [snip] > > 2.   Article 3 makes you transfer the ownership (not exclusive) of your > entered data to OSMF :  That is a Problem !! > > OSMF is gathering this way the (non exclusive)ownership of OSM as a whole. > > O