On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 2:42 PM, Simon Ward wrote:
> In any case, if I host my data elsewhere, and then “import” it into
> OpenStreetMap, do I get around this, or am I just being too hopeful?
yes, setup a company in the bahamas that holds all intellectual rights
of yours, that company would licen
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 11:28:05AM -0700, Kai Krueger wrote:
> There appear to be some interesting thoughts about this in the most recent
> LWG meeting minutes ( https://docs.google.com/View?id=dd9g3qjp_89cczk73gk )
> in the Contributor Terms Revision section:
>
> e.g.
>
> "If you want to import
On 10/29/2010 08:09 PM, Mike Dupont wrote:
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 8:28 PM, Kai Krueger wrote:
"If you want to import data copyrighted by others or where they are exerting
a copyright over data that you have derived by a method such as tracing, the
copyright should be compatible with ODbL 1.0.
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 8:28 PM, Kai Krueger wrote:
> "If you want to import data copyrighted by others or where they are exerting
> a copyright over data that you have derived by a method such as tracing, the
> copyright should be compatible with ODbL 1.0. You do not need to guarantee
> that the
On 30 October 2010 04:28, Kai Krueger wrote:
> There appear to be some interesting thoughts about this in the most recent
> LWG meeting minutes ( https://docs.google.com/View?id=dd9g3qjp_89cczk73gk )
> in the Contributor Terms Revision section:
Until recently there was no indication of any kind o
On 30 October 2010 03:56, Mike Dupont wrote:
> I see, and there is no way around this? So everyone in the world
> become bound by the contributor terms? does anything think this is
> even feasible?
Those trying to push OSM towards PD think it's feasible and are doing
their utmost to push their a
JohnSmitty wrote:
>
> That may not be enough, as they would have to agree to allow OSM to
> relicense it in future, not just agree to ODBL:
>
There appear to be some interesting thoughts about this in the most recent
LWG meeting minutes ( https://docs.google.com/View?id=dd9g3qjp_89cczk73gk )
i
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 7:25 PM, John Smith wrote:
> On 30 October 2010 00:07, Mike Dupont wrote:
>> I have written to the people who donated the data to dual license it
>> under the oodbl as well as under the creative commons.
>> http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/summary/
>
> That ma
On 30 October 2010 00:07, Mike Dupont wrote:
> I have written to the people who donated the data to dual license it
> under the oodbl as well as under the creative commons.
> http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/summary/
That may not be enough, as they would have to agree to allow OSM to
Hi,
I have been reading more about how to deal with the licenses of
Albania and Kosovo data we have been acquiring.
I must admit, I am still skeptical about this new license, but after
re-reading it a few times, it might work.
The basic idea is that it is codifying what is implicit in copyright
l
10 matches
Mail list logo
