We Croatian OSM contributers noticed that user srpskicrv started mapping
in Croatia somethings that we had no GPS traces, and also in Bosnia and
Serbia.
Guys asked srpskicrv what are his sources and he gave us this link:
http://www.vgi.mod.gov.rs/proizvodi/analogni/tk25exyu/tk25a_exyu.html
We d
On Fri, 01 Oct 2010 08:02:16 +, Ed Avis wrote:
> Or does srpskicrv mean that the mapping agency of Serbia is the only
> entity that claims copyright, and further that it has released the maps
> to the public domain?
Here is his answer:
Okay, even if I dont have time (this is the rea
Hi,
On 10/02/2010 03:43 PM, Ed Avis wrote:
This is pretty clear, then: OSM also needs to be usable on Serbian territory,
so it can't use the maps.
Right... and OSM needs to be usable in India too, so it must show
Kashmir as belonging to India as it would otherwise be illegal. And of
course O
>>those maps (the datas on them) are FREE (as long as you dont use it on
>>Serbian terretory).
>
> This is pretty clear, then: OSM also needs to be usable on Serbian
> territory,
> so it can't use the maps.
>
I think that the argument is not that.
The argument is really
'Is the Serbian government
On 3 October 2010 01:48, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> Right... and OSM needs to be usable in India too, so it must show Kashmir as
> belonging to India as it would otherwise be illegal. And of course OSM must
> be usable in Pakistan so it must show Kashmir as disputed territory
> otherwise it would be i
Hi,
On 10/03/2010 04:31 AM, John Smith wrote:
None of those examples applies since it was a question about copyright
ownership.
I don't see why we should treat a nation state's laws about copyright
any different than a nation state's idiosyncratic laws about maps or
surveying. If you are in
On 2 October 2010 23:29, wrote:
> I think that the argument is not that.
> The argument is really
> 'Is the Serbian government the legal successor of the Yugoslav government
> in Serbian territories?'
> Would an international court give the rights to the Serbian government?
> I think that there i
On 3 October 2010 17:49, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> I don't see why we should treat a nation state's laws about copyright any
> different than a nation state's idiosyncratic laws about maps or surveying.
> If you are in Serbia and violate their copyright you'll end up being
> questioned by the authori
On Sat, 02 Oct 2010 17:48:39 +0200, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 10/02/2010 03:43 PM, Ed Avis wrote:
>> This is pretty clear, then: OSM also needs to be usable on Serbian territory,
>> so it can't use the maps.
>
> Right... and OSM needs to be usable in India too, so it must show
> Kashmir a
On Sun, 3 Oct 2010 09:41:00 +0100, Francis Davey wrote:
> On 2 October 2010 23:29, wrote:
>> The argument is really
>> 'Is the Serbian government the legal successor of the Yugoslav government
>> in Serbian territories?'
>
> If (say) Serbia were to use OSMF or an OSM user in London, the local
>
On Mon, 04 Oct 2010 08:21:12 +0200,
jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com wrote:
> Just an observation :
> These maps look just like if not identical to the russian topographical
> maps. mike
Are russian topographical maps free usable with OSM?
--
pratite me na twitteru - www.twitter.com/valentt
blo
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 8:57 AM, Valent Turkovic
wrote:
> On Mon, 04 Oct 2010 08:21:12 +0200,
> jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com wrote:
>
>> Just an observation :
>> These maps look just like if not identical to the russian topographical
>> maps. mike
>
> Are russian topographical maps free usable wi
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 12:09 AM, jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com <
jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> that is another contentious issue, they are defactor public domain IMHO.
> mike
>
> AFAIK, not in Russia.
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@
Am 02.10.2010 14:36, schrieb Valent Turkovic:
Here is his answer:
Those countries have their own geogrphical or geodesist institutes. So:
the VGI is selling those OLD prints and they have still an copyright on
reproduction of those papers, BUT NOT THE CONTAINED DATA !!!
The fact that the ne
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 4:51 AM, Ulf Möller wrote:
> Am 02.10.2010 14:36, schrieb Valent Turkovic:
>> I agree that it is a grey zone, but who will say that its illegal?
>
> OSM doesn't accept data from grey zones
It'll be interesting to see how the ODbL switchover takes place, then.
15 matches
Mail list logo
