> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:legal-talk-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dair Grant
> Sent: 16 October 2008 16:31
> To: legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
> Subject: [Spam] Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Licence brief/Use Case - final call
> forcomments
"Peter Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[changeset supply with products and machine-readability]
> I have updated the wording. Is it any better?
I fished
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Open_Data_License#A_brief_for_the_proposed_licence
out of a browser history. I think it deals with th
Frederik Ramm wrote:
> What leads you to assume that your .ai files are databases?
>
> They're computer readable and they have individual objects that can
> be accessed... but what file hasn't?
From ODBL: "Database A collection of Data arranged in a systematic
or methodical way and individua
Hi,
> That's basically because the maps I've drawn are Derivative, not
> Collective.
What leads you to assume that your .ai files are databases?
They're computer readable and they have individual objects that can
be accessed... but what file hasn't?
At what stage of processing would they, in
