On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 12:49 PM, Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com wrote:
Anthony o...@... writes:
However, this part remains: Subject to Section 3 and 4 below, You
hereby grant to OSMF and any party that receives Your Contents a
worldwide, royalty-free, non-exclusive, perpetual, irrevocable licence
Anthony o...@... writes:
Other People hold rights in Their Contents, not in Your Contents. The
Work is derived from Your Contents and Their Contents. Would a
definition of Your Contents help clarify that?
Yes, it would - although I think that the approach I proposed of
'section A - rights you
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 5:40 AM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
Other People hold rights in Their Contents, not in Your Contents. The
At least in the case of Nearmap, they hold rights in Your Contents too:
You will own all Derived Works that you create. However, you may only
distribute Derived
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 1:54 PM, Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com wrote:
Anthony o...@... writes:
The way I read it, Your Contents = the material contributed by You,
as distinguished from the preexisting material employed in the work
So, if I just bulk-uploaded data from somewhere else, the 'Your
It's a
summaryhttp://www.google.com.au/search?sourceid=chromeie=UTF-8q=define:+summary,
which means that it omits some of the detail. The actual licence is at
http://www.nearmap.com/products/community-licence
http://www.nearmap.com/products/community-licenceRegards
Ben
On 17 November 2010
On 15 November 2010 15:33, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
Is that the only way to read the terms? Paragraph 2 merely say that
you, the person uploading the data, grant a license to OSMF.
Paragraph 2 does not warrant that *no one else* (e.g. Nearmap) might
*also* have rights which still need
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 7:09 PM, Ben Last ben.l...@nearmap.com wrote:
In order to derive data from nearmap.com PhotoMaps, you must agree to our
community licence, which says:
If you derive information from observing our PhotoMaps, and include that
information in a work, you will own that work,
On 15 November 2010 22:47, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
It seems there is an assumption by the authors of the CTs that, as the
contributor of data:
1) you own the copyright to that data; and therefore
2) you can, and are willing to, grant an extremely wide licence to OSMF
I'm
So, it's been a few months now. Any signs of progress on CTs that
would be compatible with data providers like NearMap?
Steve
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
Hi
From the nearmap.com side, there have been a couple of emails since the
discussion with the LWG, but nothing in the last month. I've been reading
the minutes and check the redrafting of the Contributor Terms (
10 matches
Mail list logo
