Re: [OSM-legal-talk] OS Copyright Notice and Year

2009-03-23 Thread Richard Fairhurst
TimSC wrote: The safe move move might be to use the latest date. Now based on the Office of Public Service Information web page the copyright year IS the year of first publication My understanding is that this could refer to first publication of the revised edition - in other words, take

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] OS Copyright Notice and Year

2009-03-23 Thread Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists)
-Original Message- From: legal-talk-boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto:legal-talk- boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Richard Fairhurst Sent: 23 March 2009 10:33 AM To: legal-talk@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] OS Copyright Notice and Year TimSC wrote: The safe move

[OSM-legal-talk] OS Copyright Notice and Year

2009-03-20 Thread TimSC
Dear talk-legal, I want to confirm the situation on OS crown copyright and specifically maps with a copyright notice and year in the bottom left of the map. Before 1959-ish, most OS maps did not have a copyright notice and the year of first publication was difficult to determine. The copyright