Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Produced Work guideline working

2009-05-23 Thread Matt Amos
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 11:01 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote: Mike Collinson wrote: If it was intended for the extraction of the original data, then it is a database and not a Produced Work. Otherwise it is a Produced Work. We can clearly define things that are USUALLY Produced

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Produced Work guideline working

2009-05-22 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, Mike Collinson wrote: If it was intended for the extraction of the original data, then it is a database and not a Produced Work. Otherwise it is a Produced Work. We can clearly define things that are USUALLY Produced Works: .PNG, JPG, .PDF, SVG images and any raster image; a map in a

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Produced Work guideline working

2009-05-22 Thread 80n
Actually I think the duck test http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duck_test is the simplest way of approaching this problem. If someone treats something as a database then its a database. Otherwise its a produced work. They can call it whatever they like when the publish it. The duck test kicks in

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Produced Work guideline working

2009-05-22 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, 80n wrote: Actually I think the duck test http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duck_test is the simplest way of approaching this problem. If someone treats something as a database then its a database. Otherwise its a produced work. They can call it whatever they like when the publish it. The