On 1 Mar 2009, at 21:49, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Peter Miller wrote:
>> I think these Use Cases are going to end up being twins of an
>> eventual
>> FAQ that I imagine will exist.
>
> I am starting to think that perhaps the license should be
> accompanied by
> a kind of "interpretation
Hi,
Peter Miller wrote:
> I think these Use Cases are going to end up being twins of an eventual
> FAQ that I imagine will exist.
I am starting to think that perhaps the license should be accompanied by
a kind of "interpretation document" which may or may not be the same as
this FAQ.
There
I am proposing the update the text on the Use Cases page. I intend to
merge some of the different Use Cases and introduce some new ones
based on the problematic areas we are exploring on the list. I will
also tweek the wording to make it clearer for the next legal review
(especially the on
