Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Review of IndianaMap as potential datasource

2014-04-21 Thread Luis Villa
t OSM already had such a process, but I don't see any mention of it in this thread, so I must be confusing it with something else. Hope that helps- Luis > > > *From:* Mike Dupont [mailto:jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com] > *Sent:* Saturday, April 19, 2014 1:10 PM > *To:* Stephan

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Review of IndianaMap as potential datasource

2014-04-19 Thread Paul Norman
further work. From: Mike Dupont [mailto:jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com] Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2014 1:10 PM To: Stephan Knauss Cc: Licensing and other legal discussions. Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Review of IndianaMap as potential datasource Oh i almost forgot. Well look, they could use

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Review of IndianaMap as potential datasource

2014-04-19 Thread Mike Dupont
Oh i almost forgot. Well look, they could use the otrs for marking it as public domain. I am sure you can modify the otrs text to include a special text for osm as well. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Email_templates so just add in the osm text as well as the creative commons. make it

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Review of IndianaMap as potential datasource

2014-04-19 Thread Stephan Knauss
If the data is creative commons we can't use it. We can't neither fulfill the attribution nor is it compatible with the contributor terms which allows changing the license. Stephan On April 19, 2014 5:19:54 PM CEST, Mike Dupont wrote: >On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 8:00 PM, Richard Weait >wrote:

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Review of IndianaMap as potential datasource

2014-04-19 Thread Mike Dupont
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 8:00 PM, Richard Weait wrote: > Well no, Mike, I don't think so. What rights a publisher grants to > Wikipedia has nothing to do with what rights a publisher grants to > OpenStreetMap. Wikipedia has no ownership interest in OpenStreetMap, > nor vice-versa. > If wikipedi

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Review of IndianaMap as potential datasource

2014-04-18 Thread Richard Weait
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Mike Dupont wrote: > the wikipedia has a nice otrs system, I supposed you could use it > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:OTRS > > so let them sign something that allows the data to be used by wikipedia and > that should cover osm as well. Well no, Mike, I

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Review of IndianaMap as potential datasource

2014-04-18 Thread Luis Villa
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 10:02 AM, Mike Dupont < jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com> wrote: > the wikipedia has a nice otrs system, I supposed you could use it > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:OTRS > > so let them sign something that allows the data to be used by wikipedia > and that should cov

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Review of IndianaMap as potential datasource

2014-04-18 Thread Mike Dupont
the wikipedia has a nice otrs system, I supposed you could use it http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:OTRS so let them sign something that allows the data to be used by wikipedia and that should cover osm as well. On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Eric Jiang wrote: > Greetings, > I am inter

[OSM-legal-talk] Review of IndianaMap as potential datasource

2014-04-18 Thread Eric Jiang
Greetings, I am interested in better data for Indiana, USA, and would like to have someone else double-check that there are no legal/policy issues with using GIS data from IndianaMap[1] in OSM. I talked to one of their employees over the phone, and he said that the data is completely public, with n