On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 8:11 PM, Nick Whitelegg
wrote:
> This does raise a legal dilemma though. Should the path stay in OSM and risk
> the possible consequences - or should the path be deleted, risking potential
> OS copyright infringement (as it was the OS that confirmed that the path
> didn't i
On 20/08/11 11:11, Nick Whitelegg wrote:
This does raise a legal dilemma though. Should the path stay in OSM and
risk the possible consequences - or should the path be deleted, risking
potential OS copyright infringement (as it was the OS that confirmed
that the path didn't in fact exist)?
Sur
Had an experience yesterday which raises an interesting legal question. Around
Easter 2010, IIRC, I surveyed what appeared to be a footpath in good faith: the
footpath sign appeared to point down a gravel track across a field. Yesterday,
as part of another mapping expedition, I followed said fo
