Michael,
On 01/28/2016 07:42 PM, Michael Ledford wrote:
> I believe that
> updating the OSM database upholds share-alike.
Share-alike means that you have to make your derived database available
under ODbL on request. If you regularly make sure your database contents
go into OSM then you could po
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 6:25 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> Share-alike means that you have to make your derived database available
> under ODbL on request. If you regularly make sure your database contents
> go into OSM then you could potentially say, if such a request occurs,
> "it's all in OSM", bu
Am 04.02.2016 um 04:07 schrieb Michael Ledford:
> ...
>> Worst case, if the data you upload contains copyrighted material and we
>> cannot easily enough identify which of your data is tainted and which is
>> ok, then *all* data you uploaded might have to be removed again.
> And this is why I am a
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 2:33 AM, Simon Poole wrote:
>
> Frederik has already touched on most of the points, however
>
> - in the business model you outlined it is your data and it is your
> responsibility to be able to identify the individual sources of
> contributions, the wholesale removal would