Thanks for the clarification, Kathleen.
> OSM does not contain residential quality of land. Even assuming there
> exists a Derivative Database with nontrivial transforms, that would only
> cover the shapes of the polygons. Actually quality scores would be not be
> subject to sharealike, per the
sent from a phone
> On 28. Oct 2020, at 16:19, Kathleen Lu wrote:
>
> Actually quality scores would be not be subject to sharealike, per the
> Collective Database Guideline.
Why does the collective database guideline apply? Aren‘t they coloring
OpenStreetMap derived data? To me this looks
Given that the attribution is exactly as requested on the website, I would
imagine any issues with below 993 layout pixels is an oversight or a bug. A
friendly email would suffice, but it certainly does not merit a letter from
OSMF. You are free to send the email yourself.
OSM does not contain
sent from a phone
> On 27. Oct 2020, at 22:15, Kathleen Lu via legal-talk
> wrote:
>
> Again, not conducting a comprehensive survey here, but if 95% of the polygons
> match OSM polygons, then even if there is technically a derivative database,
> then I think this simply isn't worth our time
Tom,
I think the description is rather unclear as to what the polygons are made
of. Lars-Daniel's original description made it down like they were OSM
polygons combined with each other, or otherwise simplified of details. A
quick glance at the website seemed to confirm this.
OTOH, his second email
Hi Lars-Daniel, Kathleen,
> The process doesn't seem to be trivial, since the edges of many polygons go
> across areas, where no OSM elements could have been used as a reference. So
> OSM dataset has either been changed or augmented using 3rd party reference
> (knowledge, imagery, data etc.)
Dear Kathleen,
thanks for your response.
> Even assuming the polygons are from a Derivative Database, I don't see a
> reason for the data to be released under
> https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Community_Guidelines/Trivial_Transformations_-_Guideline
The process doesn't seem to be
Hi Lars-Daniel,
Even assuming the polygons are from a Derivative Database, I don't see a
reason for the data to be released under
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Community_Guidelines/Trivial_Transformations_-_Guideline
Why would the polygons, which appear to be simply algorithmically
