Given that this is a US county agency, I take it they view the data as
public domain. That's a pretty common view for government entities in the
US.
On Fri, Oct 9, 2020, 1:14 PM Mateusz Konieczny
wrote:
> But license is still needed, right?
>
> Or is it OK to interpret "Agency has no
But license is still needed, right?
Or is it OK to interpret "Agency has no objections"
as "sounds like CC0" (I would not do this but maybe...)?
Oct 9, 2020, 20:40 by legal-talk@openstreetmap.org:
> Yes, it's fine. That is simply a disclaimer, not a limitation on use.
>
> On Fri, Oct 9, 2020
Yes, it's fine. That is simply a disclaimer, not a limitation on use.
On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 11:14 AM wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have been in contact with the Syracuse-Onondaga County Planning
> Agency (SOCPA), an Onondaga County NY agency, about the licensing of a
> building footprint layer they
Hello,
I have been in contact with the Syracuse-Onondaga County Planning
Agency (SOCPA), an Onondaga County NY agency, about the licensing of a
building footprint layer they have. My intention was to import this
layer after further review by the OSM community and myself. After
contacting the
