Hi,
On 20.01.2012 00:09, Frederik Ramm wrote:
And changing a way's references from ABC to ACB is not a modification at
all, because no reference is created and no reference is removed. We
cannot say that there was a modification in regard to any of the
references.
No, the (relative) place of
Hi,
On 18.01.2012 23:49, Frederik Ramm wrote:
They are not known. A mailing list has been created (the rebuild list)
to discuss how exactly the database rebuild is going to happen, and in
I didn't know about that list - I'll join it.
terms of policy, LWG will have the ultimate decision. And
On 19 January 2012 21:48, ant antof...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On 18.01.2012 23:49, Frederik Ramm wrote:
They are not known. A mailing list has been created (the rebuild list)
to discuss how exactly the database rebuild is going to happen, and in
I didn't know about that list - I'll join it.
Hi,
On 01/19/2012 09:48 PM, ant wrote:
So moving a way is not considered a modification of the way, but of the
individual nodes.
Yes.
And changing a way's references from ABC to ACB is not a modification at
all, because no reference is created and no reference is removed. We
cannot say that
First of all I must say that I highly respect the work of everyone who
has been actively involved in the licence change, including the LWG
members, the writers of licence change inspection programs and everyone
involved in discussions.
I have been watching the process for more than two years
Knowing it does not really start the discussion: I totally agree.
Lukas (LM_1)
2012/1/18 ant antof...@gmail.com:
First of all I must say that I highly respect the work of everyone who has
been actively involved in the licence change, including the LWG members, the
writers of licence change
Hi,
On 01/18/2012 06:13 PM, ant wrote:
As far as I can see the details of the implementation of the licence
change, i.e. of what is actually going to happen on April 1st, are not
known - or at least not revealed. Correct me if I am wrong.
They are not known. A mailing list has been created
