Macdonald Stainsby wrote:
> > If I were you, I would not simply reduce Machiavelli to a simple "strategist"
>though--
> he
> > makes several hypothetical assumptions about human nature. That is why, realist/
> > neo-realist theorist of international relations find support to their theses in hi
> If I were you, I would not simply reduce Machiavelli to a simple "strategist"
>though--
he
> makes several hypothetical assumptions about human nature. That is why, realist/
> neo-realist theorist of international relations find support to their theses in his
> writings. They see states competi
I don't remember exactly where, but Mary Dietz must have published an article about
Machiavelli, which was controversial at the time. It must be in _American Political
Science
Review_ (late 80s, early 90s?)
If I were you, I would not simply reduce Machiavelli to a simple "strategist" though--
Hello all,
I have but a simple request. I am currently finishing up an essay on Machiavelli with a
thesis that, to put it simply, states that Machiavelli is not a psychiatrist and the
Prince is not about "human nature" and its ugliness. The Prince can be a guide to
tactics in building a society in
