I hate it when this happens. I was getting all settled in without this sort of
nonsense.
I'm removing Red Rebel.
Take Care, James. I hope you get over this habit soon. None of it can be tolerated
here. I look into the future and await your valuable forwards on the other lists.
Just not here. Bye!
I sent out a private note to M.Mark... So now I guess I'm stuck sending out a public
note. MarxistMark: I asked you to tone down the number of these (very good) little
clips from WWII to one every two or three days. That would be plently. Thank you.
Macdonald Stainsby,
Co-Moderator.
- Origin
En relación a Re: [L-I] Moderator's Note: re: Turkey. DHKC - Jo,
el 3 Sep 00, a las 5:53, Tabe Kooistra dijo:
> On Sun, Sep 03, 2000 at 05:58:56PM -0700, Macdonald Stainsby wrote: >
> This kind of name calling will stop NOW, or your participation in the
> list
>
> If this
On Sun, Sep 03, 2000 at 05:58:56PM -0700, Macdonald Stainsby wrote:
> This kind of name calling will stop NOW, or your participation in the list
If this guy stays, count me out
___
Leninist-International mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To change your o
This kind of name calling will stop NOW, or your participation in the list
will instead. No further warnings will be given. Hopefully Anton will simply
ignore this attack.
Can we please stick to issues and not ad-hominem?
Macdonald Stainsby,
co-moderator
- Original Message -
From: "Tabe
thank you, nestor. some of us are looking for information - not
personal diatribes.
norm
Nestor Miguel Gorojovsky wrote:
>
> En relación a RE: [L-I] Cuba,
> el 28 Aug 00, a las 15:40, Mark Jones dijo:
>
> >
> > Nestor Miguel Gorojovsky dijo:
> >
> > >> In the end, the result of all this is e
En relación a RE: [L-I] Cuba,
el 28 Aug 00, a las 15:40, Mark Jones dijo:
>
> Nestor Miguel Gorojovsky dijo:
>
> >> In the end, the result of all this is either deserved and navel-
> > gazing loneliness for the Left, or tremendous defeats (such as in
> > Bolivia, 1972) for the masses.
> >
> > A
Comrades, this is a clerical posting, but please read it.
I was tempted to write this after John Cattalinoto's mail on the
Balkans but I decided to wait and see. I waited and saw: postings on
this thread is beginning to look like an endless chain of repeatedly
copied postings with some new additi
alising* or *focussing* debate about the
Balkans/Yugoslavia; we need to do more stuff on Nato + geopolitics.
Mark
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 15 August 2000 23:00
> To: [EMAIL PROTE
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 15 August 2000 23:00
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [L-I] Moderator's note on the Kossovo debate
>
>
> Dear friends,
>
> This argument about Kosovo isnot in a vacuum,
Dear friends,
This argument about Kosovo isnot in a vacuum, in life or on this list. There
was a long back and forth argument between me and Schneider readable on the
LI archives. In it, I presented much evidcence, and some useful reference
material.
Besides the LI archives, where one can r
The debate between cdes. Schneider and Israel is gathering pressure
by the seconds. While Israel began by a rendering of Schneider's
positions that can be reasonably understood as much too sarcastic,
Schneider retorts with a similar one when dismisses information by
attributing it to Cetniks (BTW:
12 matches
Mail list logo