Hallöchen!
Ulrich Pegelow writes:
> Am 12.12.2016 um 07:15 schrieb Torsten Bronger:
>
>>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>>File "/usr/bin/lensfun-update-data", line 46, in
>>> import lensfun
>>> ImportError: No module named 'lensfun'
>>>
>>> There is no lensfun.py in neither of my
Am 12.12.2016 um 07:15 schrieb Torsten Bronger:
>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>File "/usr/bin/lensfun-update-data", line 46, in
>> import lensfun
>> ImportError: No module named 'lensfun'
>>
>> There is no lensfun.py in neither of my installed packages:
>
> It is in "lensfun/__in
On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 9:18 PM, Alexander Gruber wrote:
> Hello together,
>
> I know that someone should not ask for ETA but as the last release of
> lensfun is now more than a year old I'm brave enough to do so. Is a new
> release planned anytime? As many programs rely on the stable releases of
>
Hallöchen!
Roman Lebedev writes:
> [...]
>
> I'd expect that for not-broken-by-design situations, i.e. in
> 99.99% cases, the parametric formula is better in any regard. Do
> you plan on including these vignetting bitmap profiles into the
> lensdb.xml? If yes, how is it going to be made sure tha
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 10:53 AM, Torsten Bronger
wrote:
> Hallöchen!
>
> Louis Granboulan writes:
>
>> [...]
>>
>> My idea was to use the Fx special effects of ImageMagick to
>> experiment with various correction formulas. But I have not been
>> able to reproduce with ImageMagick the effect of u
Hallöchen!
Louis Granboulan writes:
> [...]
>
> My idea was to use the Fx special effects of ImageMagick to
> experiment with various correction formulas. But I have not been
> able to reproduce with ImageMagick the effect of using lensfun
> profiles in darktable.
>
> [...] The page
> http://le
