On Apr 16, 7:57 am, "Edward K. Ream" wrote:
[]
> My hunch is that these ideas are important, perhaps extremely
> important.
>
> The present situation reminds me of my first impression of e's
> dynaButtons. I didn't really understand them at first, but the phrase
> "bring scripts to nodes" event
Ville wrote:
> I don't see it's very feasible to compile Tk / Qt code to
> javascript... If it was possible, it would be pretty close to "holy
> grail" for programming in general, not just Leo.
But what about a pyjamas-based backend... now that would be off the
charts...
AK
--~--~-~--~-
Edward wrote:
> No need to feel guilty. It's often useful to look again at fundamental
> issues, even if (or maybe especially because) one isn't considering
> "accurate" details. It is for this reason that it is so *useful* to forget
> how things work, and especially why things "can't" work. T
On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 3:52 PM, lkcl wrote:
> the possibilities are dramatic and considerable: there's the distinct
> possibility, for example, of compiling the entire leo application into
> javascript, to run in the web browser.
I don't see it's very feasible to compile Tk / Qt code to
javasc
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Alia K wrote:
>
> I've been feeling a little bit guilty about shooting my mouth off on
> @leo.directives without really understanding the way leo's fundamental
> nodes work.
No need to feel guilty. It's often useful to look again at fundamental
issues, even i
On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 8:52 AM, lkcl wrote:
>
> i'd heard of leo about two years ago, and was overawed by the
> concept. i just wanted to point out that pyjamas is a python-to-
> javascript compiler, so many of the things on
> http://leo.zwiki.org/LeoInAjax
> that are listed as "near-impossible
hi folks,
i'd heard of leo about two years ago, and was overawed by the
concept. i just wanted to point out that pyjamas is a python-to-
javascript compiler, so many of the things on http://leo.zwiki.org/LeoInAjax
that are listed as "near-impossible" or "nice to have" are in fact a
lot closer t
