Maybe you should using different decorators.
No, it doesn't work. In leo/commands/helpCommands I replaced:
>
> def cmd(name):
> '''Command decorator for the helpCommands class.'''
> return g.new_cmd_decorator(name,['c','helpCommands',])
>
> with cmd = g.cmd where g.cmd is defined as you
On Sun, 17 May 2015 11:48:26 -0500
"'Terry Brown' via leo-editor" wrote:
> file:///home/tbrown/t/Package/leo/git/leo-editor/leo/plugins/leoPluginsRef.leo#Plugins:2-->Scripting:14-->@file%20leoscreen.py:0-->cmd_run_all_here%20(leoscreen_Controller):12
>
> and friends are getting c instead of {'c'
On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 11:48 AM, 'Terry Brown' via leo-editor <
leo-editor@googlegroups.com> wrote:
>
> leoscreen.py:0-->cmd_run_all_here
>
> and friends are getting ``c`` instead of ``{'c':c}`` now as their first
>
> argument.
>
I see you changed
cmd_run_all_here
at rev 0d3dc41.
On Sunday, May 17, 2015 at 7:14:33 AM UTC-5, Edward K. Ream wrote:
> We want a diff that shows only changes that *do *change the [ast tree,
that is, the tree's hash].
I haven't found any such tool yet. It's an important, non-trivial problem.
I only have some vague ideas at present.
If we are
On Mon, 18 May 2015 06:50:53 -0700 (PDT)
"Edward K. Ream" wrote:
> On Sunday, May 17, 2015 at 7:14:33 AM UTC-5, Edward K. Ream wrote:
>
> > We want a diff that shows only changes that *do *change the [ast
> > tree,
> that is, the tree's hash].
>
> I haven't found any such tool yet. It's an imp
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 9:44 AM, 'Terry Brown' via leo-editor <
leo-editor@googlegroups.com> wrote:
>
> There are tools that measure coverage, their methods might be
> interesting to you beyond the information about coverage they provide.
>
Thanks for the reminder.
EKR
--
You received this me
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 3:45 AM, wrote:
>
Maybe you should using different decorators.
I think the present code is good enough.
Certainly @keybinding isn't needed. The defaults
belong in leoSettings.leo.
Imo, the @g.cmd project has completed successfully.
EKR
--
You received this me
