Re: Should leoeditor.com Be Moved To GitHub or Somewhere Else?

2022-12-28 Thread Thomas Passin
I meant that the server should be more available to devs or an admin. Right now, it may very well that only Speed and Edward can access it to make changes, etc. Also, someone is presumably paying for the server and the domain. That person might go away or lose interest at some time, and then

Re: Failing unit test in devel branch

2022-12-28 Thread Thomas Passin
I doubt that it's actually "required" in the sense that tk is used any more. If a test calls for it, probably that test should be updated. On Wednesday, December 28, 2022 at 2:23:07 PM UTC-5 viktor@gmail.com wrote: > Hello Thomas, > > tbp1...@gmail.com schrieb am Mittwoch, 28. Dezember 202

Re: Should leoeditor.com Be Moved To GitHub or Somewhere Else?

2022-12-28 Thread jkn
I'm not very clear about the motivation - what does 'make leoeditor.com more available...' mean? If it's an idea towards (for instance) allowing more, interested, parties contributing to Leo's documentation, then I think that is a good idea. It's not clear to me whether that is where the sugges

Re: Failing unit test in devel branch

2022-12-28 Thread Viktor Ransmayr
Hello Thomas, tbp1...@gmail.com schrieb am Mittwoch, 28. Dezember 2022 um 19:47:10 UTC+1: > " I also double-checked & saw that 'setup.py' has added "tk" as an install > requirement." > > I wonder if Leo needs tk at all any more. Maybe it can be removed as a > requirement. > Here's the complet

Re: Failing unit test in devel branch

2022-12-28 Thread Thomas Passin
" I also double-checked & saw that 'setup.py' has added "tk" as an install requirement." I wonder if Leo needs tk at all any more. Maybe it can be removed as a requirement. On Wednesday, December 28, 2022 at 1:30:10 PM UTC-5 viktor@gmail.com wrote: > Hello Thomas, > > Thanks for this exp

Re: Failing unit test in devel branch

2022-12-28 Thread Thomas Passin
There's no "blame" here, just a need to work around how the Linux packagers have decided to work. I *think* they want to split up and locate python components in particular ways to suit their packaging philosophies, so they have to modify pip, etc., to work that way. It is possible to install

Re: Failing unit test in devel branch

2022-12-28 Thread Viktor Ransmayr
Hello Edward & Thomas, As an additional info Leo's unit tests are working fine in version 6.7.1 on both Debian- & Fedora Linux. With kind regards, Viktor -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop r

Re: Failing unit test in devel branch

2022-12-28 Thread Viktor Ransmayr
Hello Thomas, Thanks for this explanation / info. tbp1...@gmail.com schrieb am Mittwoch, 28. Dezember 2022 um 16:16:37 UTC+1: > You have to install it using the package manager. Here is what I have > found (quoted from the Users' Guide for my GF4 project):: > > "On Debian/Ubuntu, tkinter has t

Re: Failing unittest in devel branch

2022-12-28 Thread Thomas Passin
You have to install it using the package manager. Here is what I have found (quoted from the Users' Guide for my GF4 project):: "On Debian/Ubuntu, tkinter has to be installed by the package manager: sudo apt-get install python3-tk This may also be the case with some non-Debian systems. Th

Failing unittest in devel branch

2022-12-28 Thread Viktor Ransmayr
Hello Edward, When I run the unit tests for the latest version of the devel branch, I receive the following error: ### == ERROR: test_cursesGui2 (leo.unittests.test_plugins.TestPlugins) -