On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 2:58 PM jkn wrote:
> Well, maybe we should have a push to improve the 'visibility' of
> scripts.leo. I can't remember how it is 'promoted', perhaps some work in
> that are would be worthwhile.
>
> I see there is no introduction to itself inside the file, so it's not very
>
Well, maybe we should have a push to improve the 'visibility' of
scripts.leo. I can't remember how it is 'promoted', perhaps some work in
that are would be worthwhile.
I see there is no introduction to itself inside the file, so it's not very
clear what it's supposed to represent.
Would
On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 4:23 AM jkn wrote:
>
> Yes ... 'many' of the scripts I come across, eg. on this newsgroup, need a
> bit of tweaking to run with more modern Leo. But I think a collection with
> some of the concepts 'curated' and commented on would be useful.
>
> Like you, I always forget
Where do you think a collection like that should live, bearing in mind that
it should be easy for a newbie to learn about it?
On Tuesday, January 3, 2023 at 5:23:47 AM UTC-5 jkn wrote:
>
> Yes ... 'many' of the scripts I come across, eg. on this newsgroup, need a
> bit of tweaking to run with
Yes ... 'many' of the scripts I come across, eg. on this newsgroup, need a
bit of tweaking to run with more modern Leo. But I think a collection with
some of the concepts 'curated' and commented on would be useful.
Like you, I always forget about scripts.leo; not sure that is the right
place.
