Re: Please help me edit Leo's wikipedia page

On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 6:23 PM Thomas Passin wrote: > If you had [rotated the image], it would have been pixelated to hell and > gone. > :-) Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiv

Re: Please help me edit Leo's wikipedia page

If you had, it would have been pixelated to hell and gone. On Monday, January 16, 2023 at 6:58:05 PM UTC-5 Edward K. Ream wrote: > On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 4:08 PM jkn wrote: > > BTW if it turns out it's a matter of $10 i am happy to pay for it as a >> thanks for Leo ;-) >> > > Thanks! > > also

Re: Please help me edit Leo's wikipedia page

On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 4:08 PM jkn wrote: BTW if it turns out it's a matter of $10 i am happy to pay for it as a > thanks for Leo ;-) > Thanks! also FWIW: The leonine image seems a whisker off-vertical to me: looking at > the Lion's face it is turned a > few degrees anti-(counter-)clockwise. Is

Re: Please help me edit Leo's wikipedia page

On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 4:08 PM jkn wrote: > A couple of things gleaned from the dreamstime license page: > https://www.dreamstime.com/about-stock-image-licenses > Many thanks for your research. Yes, please do carry on. Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Goo

Re: Please help me edit Leo's wikipedia page

""" Thank you for contacting us. Please reply to this email string and provide the ID number of the image in question, as well as a detailed description of exactly how the image is used within the app. """ Do you want me to carry on ... ? On Monday, January 16, 2023 at 10:08:28 PM UTC jkn wrote:

Re: Please help me edit Leo's wikipedia page

A couple of things gleaned from the dreamstime license page: https://www.dreamstime.com/about-stock-image-licenses 1) The "content level" for the leonine image is level 5. For this level a 'Royalty-Free License' costs < 4$, with a 'web usage' license of < $10. The question, it seems to me, is 'w

Re: Please help me edit Leo's wikipedia page

On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 2:08 PM jkn wrote: > Yeah, I wondered about this approach. If only you could remove copyright > that way... > Your mission, should you choose to accept it, is to find out what it would cost to get a permanent license. Edward -- You received this message because you are

Re: Please help me edit Leo's wikipedia page

Yeah, I wondered about this approach. If only you could remove copyright that way... On Monday, January 16, 2023 at 3:14:49 PM UTC Edward K. Ream wrote: > On Monday, January 16, 2023 at 9:11:26 AM UTC-6 Edward K. Ream wrote: > > I've just spent about 40 minutes cleaning up SplashScreen.ico usin

Re: Please help me edit Leo's wikipedia page

On Monday, January 16, 2023 at 9:11:26 AM UTC-6 Edward K. Ream wrote: I've just spent about 40 minutes cleaning up SplashScreen.ico using this online icon editor . Attached is the latest version. It's much better without the watermark :-) -- You received thi

Re: Please help me edit Leo's wikipedia page

On Monday, January 16, 2023 at 8:08:31 AM UTC-6 Edward K. Ream wrote: On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 4:08 AM jkn wrote: I should have seen that coming! OK, fair enough. I will try to clarify, perhaps based on what Thomas found. How wedded are you to that particular lionine image? I expect we went throu

Re: Please help me edit Leo's wikipedia page

On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 4:08 AM jkn wrote: > I should have seen that coming! OK, fair enough. I will try to clarify, > perhaps based on what Thomas found. > How wedded are you to that particular lionine image? I expect we went > through all of this when that was first found... > I want to keep t

Re: Please help me edit Leo's wikipedia page

I should have seen that coming! OK, fair enough. I will try to clarify, perhaps based on what Thomas found. How wedded are you to that particular lionine image? I expect we went through all of this when that was first found... On Monday, January 16, 2023 at 9:33:50 AM UTC Edward K. Ream wrote:

Re: Please help me edit Leo's wikipedia page

On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 2:46 AM jkn wrote: I think that on the one hand putting out more publicity for Leo, eg. via > the Wikipedia page, and on the other suggesting that such possible > violation of copyright is 'not worth worrying about', is ... misguided. Alright. I've just delegated you to

Re: Please help me edit Leo's wikipedia page

Yes, I see that the new version has multiple small spirals instead of one large one. ISTM that the whole point of such watermarks is to prevent 'out of rights' use. (Edward) sorry to be a pain, but I think that on the one hand putting out more publicity for Leo, eg. via the Wikipedia page, and