:
Thank you *Miles Fidelman* for that observation : It is not silly
at all!! You are right, although it is the first thing I show in
the 'LeoJs features' video, it should be the first (or almost
first) thing i write about at the top of the documentation!!
...
Silly observation - but...
LeoJS looks awfully interesting, but nowhere on the github site is a
simple "click here" link to download and run it as a webapp. There's the
code, the video, but nothing that says "click here" (as there is with,
say TiddlyWiki). Or am I
ed no comments at all. I am not one of them.
Personally, I'm a big proponent of writing the documentation first. Then
filling it in with code. Makes life a lot easier for all concerned -
particularly those who have to deploy & maintain big systems.
Miles Fidelman
--
In theory, there is
er some of the more obvious
era-specific references).
Surprised? I mean, it sure seems like recent generations of developers
just keep making the same old mistakes, and then ultimately reinventing
the same stuff that folks did back in the day. Not a profession that
learns from the past.
Mile
able archive. My advice: Don't. Just don't.
(spoken as someone who hosts a bunch of email lists - Sympa is my
platform of choice)
Miles Fidelman
On 8/30/19 11:02 AM, Edward K. Ream wrote:
On Friday, August 30, 2019 at 9:11:48 AM UTC-5, Chris George wrote:
I am currently loo
try Shift-Ctrl-P :-)
The atom editor deserves serious consideration as a "hosting
platform" for Leo's technology, for at least the following reasons:
And here I was hoping you meant Atom & AtomPub -
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atom_(Web_standard)
Miles Fide
Well, personally, I recommend Mac laptops - tremendous hardware, and
they're BSD unix underneath. And it's easy enough to run pretty much
any Linux or BSD distro under a hypervisor - at near native speed.
I typically have Parallels running, with a Windows VM running (for
Quicken and Visio), k
Slightly belated thanks!
Mile Fidelman
Edward K. Ream wrote:
On Sunday, March 22, 2015 at 1:26:59 PM UTC-5, Miles Fidelman wrote:
I was kind of hoping that there was more than just the code itself,
along the lines of this developer documentation for TiddlyWiki:
I've update
Edward K. Ream wrote:
On Saturday, March 21, 2015 at 10:38:11 PM UTC-5, Miles Fidelman wrote:
> I don't suppose somebody can point me to a good summary of Leo's
internals - file/database structure, overall architecture, etc.?
Start here <http://leoeditor.com/the
. It sure
would be helpful to find some good documentation of what goes on under
the hood.
Thanks very much,
Miles Fidelman
--
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is. Yogi Berra
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
t of the stuff running on our servers is installed the old-fashioned
way (wget...; gunzip; tar; ./configure; make; make install)
- some software is much better at keeping itself up-to-date (e.g.,
Wordpress)
Your mileage may vary.
Miles Fidelman
Edward
--
You received this message because yo
rences.
4. Leo script can be embedded in @button nodes.
5. Leo scripts can be embedded in @test nodes.
6. Leo scripts can create external files, a special case of:
7. Leo scripts can do anything Python can do.
I could be wrong, but I believe that emacs Lisp-based scripts can do all
that as well.
Edward K. Ream wrote:
Maybe, but there is a tantalizing possibility. I prototyped Leo in
about two hours, using the MORE outliner as a prototype, and inventing
@others in the process. (I was already deeply involved with sections
and section references.)
Gee, what I'd give for an up-to-da
Terry Brown wrote:
On Mon, 30 Sep 2013 11:26:37 -0400
Miles Fidelman wrote:
I'm surprised nobody has mentioned this yet: Leo has pretty much
written off Mac users, and close to written off large chunks of Linux users.
Interesting, I know there's issues with Mac., which I think
duf...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, 30 September 2013 17:26:37 UTC+2, Miles Fidelman wrote:
I'm surprised nobody has mentioned this yet: Leo has pretty much
written off Mac users, and close to written off large chunks of
Linux users.
Sure, you CAN install and get it to wo
some instructions on how to use Homebrew (and does one
really want to use a Ruby based installer to install something written
in Python?).
Somehow, one gets just a little squirrely contemplating a Python based
IDE that seems to have been targeted at a Windows environment. That
alone raises som
n particular (e.g., neo4J), object
oriented datbases, text databases, semantic databases (e.g., RDF
triplestores), but if you're munging huge amounts of data - be it
business transactions or sensor records, tables, a la RDBMS (or
spreadsheets) turn out to be both conceptually and c
ce for O'Reilly Radar, at:
http://radar.oreilly.com/2012/08/smart-notebooks-for-linking-virtual-teams-across-the-net.html
I'd welcome comments, support, likes, tweets, blogs, ...
Thank you very much,
Miles Fidelman
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
18 matches
Mail list logo
