Re: Autocomplete

On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 9:06 AM, Arjan wrote: I happened upon Python auto-completion somewhere in the docs (nice > feature!). Upon first trying it, I got an exception: > ​This uncovered a can of worms ;-) Rev 6d95fe6 makes many changes to leo/external/codewise.py. How

Autocomplete

event=event) File "/home/username/bin/leo-editor/leo/core/leoKeys.py", line 218, in autoComplete self.start(event) File "/home/username/bin/leo-editor/leo/core/leoKeys.py", line 955, in start self.init_qcompleter(event) File "/home/username/bin/leo-editor/leo/co

Re: autocomplete: is it complete?

On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 8:26 PM, wgw wgwin...@gmail.com wrote: In the docs it says: When a single completion is shown, typing ‘?’ will show the docstring for a method. For example: c.atFileCommands.write? shows: Write a 4.x derived file. root is the position of an @file node Does

Re: autocomplete: is it complete?

Thanks Edward, I will put this in a bug report (in fact, the exact example does not work for me -- maybe a ubuntu thing). I do think autocomplete is a crucial feature. Leo has such an enormous array of good code (and example code) that it is a shame to hide it. In fact, the ability to quickly

Re: autocomplete: is it complete?

One last thought about this: most projects that are Leo's size have api docs. I'm thinking of something like what you will find here: http://pyjs.org/api/ or, of course, here http://www.gwtproject.org/javadoc/latest/index.html Really, what will make Leo popular is getting more programmers

Re: autocomplete: is it complete?

On 10/28/2013 3:29 PM, wgw wrote: One last thought about this: most projects that are Leo's size have api docs. I'm thinking of something like what you will find here: http://pyjs.org/api/ or, of course, here http://www.gwtproject.org/javadoc/latest/index.html Really, what will make Leo

Re: autocomplete: is it complete?

Brilliant! A great step forward for anyone who wants to understand the code base and contribute. I will put in a feature request: 1) fix the qt dimension of readthedocs, 2) index leo on nullege (http://nullege.com) -- it indexes every string in the project-- and finally, one day, 3) do all

Re: autocomplete: is it complete?

I spoke too soon: I see that readthedocs does everything nullege does. So nullege is unnecessary Le lundi 28 octobre 2013 13:11:47 UTC-7, wgw a écrit : Brilliant! A great step forward for anyone who wants to understand the code base and contribute. I will put in a feature request: 1)

Re: autocomplete: is it complete?

On 10/28/2013 4:11 PM, wgw wrote: Brilliant! A great step forward for anyone who wants to understand the code base and contribute. I will put in a feature request: 1) fix the qt dimension of readthedocs, 2) index leo on nullege (http://nullege.com http://nullege.com/) -- it indexes every

autocomplete: is it complete?

, but autocomplete does complete after the dot. Workaround: g.es(c.atFileCommands.write.__doc__) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups leo-editor group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to leo-editor+unsubscr

Re: autocomplete docs out of place?

On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 11:19 PM, Matt Wilkie map...@gmail.com wrote: The doc section on Outlines[1] starts off talking about autocompletion and calltips , which I think is out of place. I agree. I think it belongs in Chapter 5: Using Leo's commandes. The same section contains sub headings

autocomplete docs out of place?

The doc section on Outlines[1] starts off talking about autocompletion and calltips , which I think is out of place. The same section contains sub headings which are not bolded or otherwise marked to stand out from the text proper. Wherever it finally lives, the autocomplete section should

Re: Using codewise (autocomplete) with Tk

On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 8:29 AM, Ville M. Vainio vivai...@gmail.com wrote: The version of codewise completer that works with Tk is now on trunk. It implements command codewise-suggest that prints the possible compeltions to log with g.es(). As such, it won't save you any typing, but it can

Re: autocomplete broken when using ipython bridge?

I have not seen your problems, but I've been playing with ILeo and have run into completion problems in IPython. These where fixed when I upgraded my pyreadline distribution. Tom --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the

autocomplete broken when using ipython bridge?

autocomplete works just fine when using it without ipython but with is says that it cannot find a module called revision.knit is this known?! --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups leo-editor group