Re: Back to No-Docks

On Sat, Sep 5, 2020 at 7:20 AM Thomas Passin wrote: > Having them be resizable - the divider between panes being movable - would > be important even if the pane layout were fixed. > I agree. That's the easy part, I think. Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the G

Re: Back to No-Docks

Having them be resizable - the divider between panes being movable - would be important even if the pane layout were fixed. On Saturday, September 5, 2020 at 7:51:04 AM UTC-4, Edward K. Ream wrote: > > On Friday, August 28, 2020 at 4:34:25 AM UTC-5, Edward K. Ream wrote: > > > I use the legacy la

Re: Back to No-Docks

On Friday, August 28, 2020 at 4:34:25 AM UTC-5, Edward K. Ream wrote: > I use the legacy layout myself, despite all the work I have put into the qt docks code. I have just created #1643 : Make Qt docks easier to use. Docks are too import

Re: Back to No-Docks

FWIW, I also had to turn them off. On Friday, August 28, 2020 at 5:34:25 AM UTC-4 Edward K. Ream wrote: > On Thursday, August 27, 2020 at 10:27:07 PM UTC-5, Thomas Passin wrote: > > Can anyone tell me how to get the pane layouts to be stable using docks? >> > > I use the legacy layout myself, de

Re: Back to No-Docks

On Thursday, August 27, 2020 at 10:27:07 PM UTC-5, Thomas Passin wrote: Can anyone tell me how to get the pane layouts to be stable using docks? > I use the legacy layout myself, despite all the work I have put into the qt docks code. Edward -- You received this message because you are subscr

Back to No-Docks

I am so fed up with --use-docks that I've given up on it and gone back to the older no-docks configuration. With docks, I can never count on the panes being the same next time I re-open an outline or restart Leo. Sometimes they are hard to restore to my liking, too. Especially during plugin d