Re: Discuss: load-leo.html should refer visitors to vscode.dev

>> Thomas: I think that either we should just remove the link, or think carefully about what it was intended to do. > Me: Let me sleep on this The question seems moot. How many people have complained that the load-leo page didn't work? Assuming that hardly anyone ever visits the page, a plug

Re: Discuss: load-leo.html should refer visitors to vscode.dev

On Sunday, July 16, 2023 at 4:21:26 PM UTC-5 Thomas wrote: OTOH, who knows when vscode.dev will be able to support Leo. I don't think that showing a visitor and XML outline file would be enlightening at all. Yes. Otoh, I want to ensure people start tracking vscode.dev. I think that either w

Re: Discuss: load-leo.html should refer visitors to vscode.dev

As we have discussed in the PR conversation, I think *leoad-leo.html* needs to go away, one way or another. It's way too feeble even if we got it working again. It wouldn't either give visitors a feel for what Leo can do or even a feel that it is well designed. OTOH, who knows when vscode.dev

Discuss: load-leo.html should refer visitors to vscode.dev

load-leo.html hasn't worked for some time. It's always been pretty feeble. Imo, load-leo.html should refer visitors to vs.code.dev , vs-code in the browser. Doing so will resolve #3441