On Sat, Jul 15, 2023 at 5:40 PM Thomas Passin wrote:
> It seems to me that one has to...have something like positions.
I agree, of course.
> generators...could be methods that return lists.
Doing without generators would be an unpythonic mistake.
Edward
--
You received this message because
On Saturday, July 15, 2023 at 5:49:29 PM UTC-4 Edward K. Ream wrote:
My initial post in this thread showed how Leo could support Imps (Immutable
Positions) without changing Leo's Position or VNode classes. I concluded
that Imps were not a good idea :-)
Vitalije not-so-subtly implies that
My initial post in this thread showed how Leo could support Imps (Immutable
Positions) without changing Leo's Position or VNode classes. I concluded
that Imps were not a good idea :-)
Vitalije not-so-subtly implies that Positions are a blunder. This post
refutes that notion.
*Positions
This ENB will try to make sense of Vitalije's idea of immutable positions.
Let's call them *Imps *:-) Leo's Position and VNode objects must stay as
they are. However, as a *thought experiment*, we can imagine adding Imps to
leo.
Don't get your hopes up. Imps are not a good idea.
*What
