On May 1, 5:08 pm, "Edward K. Ream" wrote:
> Note that p.level() does exist, so you can perform calculations relative to
> root.level().
Great, this is an important hint for me. Thank you.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 5:47 AM, zpcspm wrote:
>
> Let's assume there is a subtree in a leo outline.
> I define the level of a certain node in that subtree (relative to the
> root of that subtree), as the amount of nodes up to the root of the
> subtree.
> For example:
>
> - the root node of the su
Let's assume there is a subtree in a leo outline.
I define the level of a certain node in that subtree (relative to the
root of that subtree), as the amount of nodes up to the root of the
subtree.
For example:
- the root node of the subtree has level 0 (relative to itself)
- any child of the root
