On Sun, Aug 25, 2019 at 3:36 PM Brian Theado wrote:
> I submitted pull request
> https://github.com/leo-editor/leo-editor/pull/1302. No new failed test
> cases and the failing test case I added passes.
>
Thanks for the new unit test. I merged the code and reran all unit tests
in devel. All
On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 7:56 PM Brian Theado wrote:
> It turns out the '-m pdb' workaround for the readline crash does work for
> me running unit tests.
>
Two tips. You can add a call to g.pdb() at the start of any unit test.
Also, I run unitTest.leo with the --fail-fast command-line option.
It turns out the '-m pdb' workaround for the readline crash does work for
me running unit tests.
I decided I wanted to follow the good practice of adding a failing unit
test which exposes the bug and then show after the fix that same test
passes. I discovered there are already unit tests for
Sure, I'll do that or figure out the segfault issue sometime this week.
On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 7:26 AM Edward K. Ream wrote:
> Unfortunately, I'm not able to run unit tests without getting a segfault.
>>
> Alright. Create a new branch, and I'll run the unit tests there.
>
--
You received
On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 6:22 AM Brian Theado wrote:
Unfortunately, I'm not able to run unit tests without getting a segfault.
>
Alright. Create a new branch, and I'll run the unit tests there.
Edward
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"leo-editor"
Unfortunately, I'm not able to run unit tests without getting a segfault.
It appears to be related to loading the readline library similar to what I
reported last year:
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/leo-editor/ghiIN7irzY0/2wreFgcYDQAJ. Though
now I'm running Ubuntu 18.04. Something in the unit
On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 7:04 PM Brian Theado wrote:
> I found a core function which uses undo groups and used this code to call
> it:
>
> c.createNodeHierarchy(['a', 'b', 'c'], parent=p)
> c.redraw(p)
>
> Redoing this operation gives the same error as the test code and the
> bead+1 fixes it
I found a core function which uses undo groups and used this code to call
it:
c.createNodeHierarchy(['a', 'b', 'c'], parent=p)
c.redraw(p)
Redoing this operation gives the same error as the test code and the bead+1
fixes it also. I think this bug is affecting all grouped redo.
On Mon, Aug 19,
I think the issue is in u.redoGroup (leo/core/LeoPyRef.leo#Code-->Core
classes-->@file leoUndo.py-->class Undoer-->u.redo helpers-->u.redoGroup)
The line:
bunch = u.beads[*u.bead*]; count = 0
Should be:
bunch = u.beads[*u.bead+1*]; count = 0
That line is in both u.undoGroup and
Hmm, it didn't work for me. Using your code and following the same steps as
my original email, I get the same error message.
After that if I start from step #4 (the ctrl-b step) again, then the undo
and the redo work. But then if I start again at step #4, I get the original
error message again.
On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 11:35 AM Brian Theado
wrote:
> Thanks a lot. I'll give it a try tonight and also see if I can get similar
> code working for clone and move. After that I can try to put it all
> together.
>
You're welcome. Good luck, and feel free to ask more questions.
Edward
--
You
Thanks a lot. I'll give it a try tonight and also see if I can get similar
code working for clone and move. After that I can try to put it all
together.
On Sun, Aug 18, 2019, 9:32 AM Edward K. Ream wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 8:28 AM Edward K. Ream
> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Sun, Aug 18,
On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 8:28 AM Edward K. Ream wrote:
>
> On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 8:24 AM Edward K. Ream
> wrote:
>
> At least one problem is that p changes after:
>
> child = parent.insertAsNthChild(0)
>
This works:
groupType = 'insert child twice'
undoType = 'insert first child twice';
On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 8:24 AM Edward K. Ream wrote:
At least one problem is that p changes after:
child = parent.insertAsNthChild(0)
Edward
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop
On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 8:15 AM Edward K. Ream wrote:
> I'll take a look asap.
>
I see the behavior you describe. It persists if I replace p by parent in
the before/after calls.
Edward
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"leo-editor" group.
To
On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 8:12 AM Brian Theado wrote:
> I wrote some code to perform 2 node inserts. I added before/after undo
> commands and undo/redo of the individual operations seemed to work fine.
> But when I enclose the two operations in before/after changeGroup, then
> redo doesn't work.
>
I wrote some code to perform 2 node inserts. I added before/after undo
commands and undo/redo of the individual operations seemed to work fine.
But when I enclose the two operations in before/after changeGroup, then
redo doesn't work.
Does anyone know what I'm doing wrong?
To duplicate the
17 matches
Mail list logo