Re: Leo package as published on test.pypi.org

2023-02-14 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 10:38 AM Thomas Passin wrote: > Typo in the URL - should be test.pypi.org. As for staleness, it's only > for testing the packaging to make sure it will work on PyPi, so maybe the > staleness is not too important. > I agree. test.pypi.org need not be up to date. Edward

Re: Leo package as published on test.pypi.org

2023-02-13 Thread Thomas Passin
Typo in the URL - should be test.pypi.org. As for staleness, it's only for testing the packaging to make sure it will work on PyPi, so maybe the staleness is not too important. On Monday, February 13, 2023 at 11:14:35 AM UTC-5 David Szent-Györgyi wrote: > I was looking for a pypy package of ot

Leo package as published on test.pypi.org

2023-02-13 Thread David Szent-Györgyi
I was looking for a pypy package of other software whose next release that has been in stuck in Alpha for a long time, and I ended up searching test.pypy.org , which is a repository for testing the publishing of Python packages. I found Leo there, but the Leo package ther