On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 2:51 AM, Marcel Franke <
kugelfischtemp...@googlemail.com> wrote:
But should be also be aware that you might very fast get feedback which
> will explain what's wrong with leo, which might be frustrating.
>
That would be cool. I've only ever gotten bug reports or totally
Edward K. Ream wrote:
> The easiest advertising, and perhaps the most effective, are release
> announcements.
>
The most efficient is people talking about something. Release announcements
only fetch attention,
but they don't discussions. Also, where would you put those announcements
to?
On 15/10/15 08:28, Marcel Franke wrote:
Edward K. Ream wrote:
If I released a new version of Leo every month that would
substantially increase Leo's online presence.
Has Leo even enough manpower to deliver something worth in a
month? Because nobody
Edward K. Ream wrote:
> If I released a new version of Leo every month that would substantially
>>> increase Leo's online presence.
>>>
>>
>> Has Leo even enough manpower to deliver something worth in a month?
>> Because nobody will be impressed
>> from a list of 3 bugfixes and a new
One reason Leo isn't more widely known is that it isn't widely advertised.
Especially now that official versions appear only every 6 to 12 months.
The easiest advertising, and perhaps the most effective, are release
announcements. If I released a new version of Leo every month that would
Worked wonders for Firefox and Chrome, but both of those already had a
significant userbase. On the other hand, the approach they take
obsoletes minor versions -- nearly every release is a new major version,
often without any super-important or super-visible new features. It
feels like
