Re: Why nits matter

Seem fair enough, thanks. I can live with it now I know about the behaviour. I take on board the "It's harder than you might think..." Regards, J^n On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 6:14:57 AM UTC Edward K. Ream wrote: > On Sun, Feb 5, 2023 at 3:01 PM jkn wrote: > >> Can I raise this nit again?

Re: Why nits matter

On Sun, Feb 5, 2023 at 3:01 PM jkn wrote: > Can I raise this nit again? I just hit the (surprising, to me) behaviour, > and tracked it to #721, which is currently marked as 'won't do'. > I've just reopened #721 , with a due date of "Later".

Re: Why nits matter

It might be easiest to copy the gnx of the next child node (if there is one), and then go to that gnx after the delete. That way you wouldn't have to worry about positions changing, On Sunday, February 5, 2023 at 4:13:23 PM UTC-5 Félix wrote: > I'll just chime in to say this is not trivial.

Re: Why nits matter

I'll just chime in to say this is not trivial. (although it is good idea for a bool setting indeed, just that it would require more work than you would think.) Unless it's implemented as a 'macro' cheat that adds a 'goto-next-visible' operation after a delete/cut command . Félix On Sunday,

Re: Why nits matter

Can I raise this nit again? I just hit the (surprising, to me) behaviour, and tracked it to #721, which is currently marked as 'won't do'. I'm unclear from the conversation above whether this is for 5.7, or for all time ... ;-) Thanks, jon N On Wednesday, February 14, 2018 at 11:13:38 AM UTC

Re: Why nits matter

On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 4:52 AM, Edward K. Ream wrote: ​> ​ I have just created #721 . It will add support for @bool select-next-after-delete setting, with a default that will retain legacy operation. ​> ​ As I write

Re: Why nits matter

On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 11:40 AM, Chris George wrote: I have a nit. :-) > > When deleting nodes in the tree, after hitting delete the selection moves > up the tree. When deleting multiple children, this is unintuitive. It would > be better for the selection to move down to

Re: Why nits matter

I have a nit. :-) When deleting nodes in the tree, after hitting delete the selection moves up the tree. When deleting multiple children, this is unintuitive. It would be better for the selection to move down to the next child. If I wish to delete several children, I could start with the last

Why nits matter

I'll be removing hangnails until Leo 5.7 final. We want to advertise the best possible version of Leo. But an "official" version of Leo is largely a hoax, for the benefit of timid managers ;-) In *no way* are official releases more stable than Leo's git repo. The only advantage of official