Eric Branlund wrote:
> There's a patch attached to the bug report
>
> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1773603&group_id=8596&atid=108596
>
> which fixes a crash caused by differences between 0.93.94
> and 0.95.0
Sorry, just tested that against what is currently in CVS.
On Sun, 2 Dec 2007 12:38:49 +1100
Erik de Castro Lopo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Although Nedit works acceptably well with version
>0.93.94 of
> lesstif, the current CVS version is horribly broken.
>There are
> at least two segfaults that occur deep within libXt due
>to
> something that le
ç³»ç»ç¾¤å.å¦æææ°æ¬è¯·è°
解
产åæ¨å¹¿,ç½ç»æ¨å¹¿çéå©æ¦å¨
ä¸.ææºç信群å--第äºåªä½å¼ºå¿æ¨åº
ææºç信群å广å,å称广å第äºåªä½,
å¨å强大,ææç¬ç¹!
é客æ·éæ©åºååå¸.æ¯äº§åæ¨å¹¿,çéå©æ¦å¨!为客æ·å
è´¹æä¾åå°èæ¿
Sorry, hit send by mistake.
Patrice Dumas wrote:
> Are your issues happening on a 64 bit platform? There are some 64 bit
> related patches in fedora that may not be in cvs.
Nope, this is 32 bit x86.
> And yes, lesstif seems to me to be abandonware, but I guess that what
> would be needed for
Patrice Dumas wrote:
> Are your issues happening on a 64 bit platform? There are some 64 bit
> related patches in fedora that may not be in cvs.
Nope, this is 32 bit x86.
> And yes, lesstif seems to me to be abandonware, but I guess that what
> would be needed for a fork would be developpers. I
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 12:38:49PM +1100, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've just spent the last 4-5 hours trying to get CVS Nedit to work
> with CVS lesstif.
>
> Although Nedit works acceptably well with version 0.93.94 of
> lesstif, the current CVS version is horribly broken. There a
6 matches
Mail list logo
