Re: [Letsencrypt-devel] Salsa Migration

2018-01-22 Thread Daniel Beyer
On Mon, 2018-01-22 at 22:18 +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > (...) > > I've now moved dehydrated. > > https://salsa.debian.org/letsencrypt-team/dehydrated Thanks for moving over to salsa.d.o. I especially appreciate to have dehydrated on a GitLab instance. Big sorry I was that silent in 2017, but

[Letsencrypt-devel] Bug#839853: Bug#839853: [letsencrypt.sh] Upstream change project name

2016-10-05 Thread Daniel Beyer
Hi Jan, Thanks for your report. We are aware of the changed name and I'm already working on a renaming. It's a bit delayed right now, but I hope there will be some significant progress over the weekend. Greetings Daniel ___ Letsencrypt-devel mailing li

[Letsencrypt-devel] Bug#824928: letsencrypt.sh: move the default position of the domains file to /etc/letsencrypt.sh/

2016-06-13 Thread Daniel Beyer
Hi Mattia, On Thu, 2016-06-09 at 06:34 +0200, Daniel Beyer wrote: > Hi Mattia, > > (...) > > I'll get back to you as soon I have implemented something useful here. I pushed changes to this new branch (based on current debian/master): wip/dabe/domains.txt-in-etc-ma

[Letsencrypt-devel] Bug#824928: letsencrypt.sh: move the default position of the domains file to /etc/letsencrypt.sh/

2016-06-08 Thread Daniel Beyer
Hi Mattia, sorry for the very late response. On Thu, 2016-06-02 at 11:14 +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 06:07:34PM +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 07:14:05PM +0200, Daniel Beyer wrote: > > > I opened a PR for upstream [1], ba

[Letsencrypt-devel] Bug#824928: Bug#824928: letsencrypt.sh: move the default position of the domains file to /etc/letsencrypt.sh/

2016-05-21 Thread Daniel Beyer
Hi Mattia, On Sat, 2016-05-21 at 15:58 +0200, Daniel Beyer wrote: > (...) > > It looks like ${DOMAINS_TXT} can not be set or overridden in config.sh. > But it should be rather easy to add this feature to letsencrypt.sh. I'll > work on a patch and propose it upstream. In pa

[Letsencrypt-devel] Bug#824928: Bug#824928: letsencrypt.sh: move the default position of the domains file to /etc/letsencrypt.sh/

2016-05-21 Thread Daniel Beyer
On Sat, 2016-05-21 at 12:33 +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > Package: letsencrypt.sh > Version: 0.1.0-2 > Severity: wishlist > > As I wrote in #822493#45: > > > +Providing a list of domains to letsencrypt.sh > > += > > +If the parameter --domains is not g

[Letsencrypt-devel] Bug#822493: Bug#822493: letsencrypt.sh: config file refers to nonexisting documentation

2016-05-21 Thread Daniel Beyer
On Sat, 2016-05-21 at 12:38 +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > (...) > Daniel: do you want to do improve it any more? otherwise I'd say to > upload this thing, given #824903. I think the README.Debian is in a good shape. Thanks a lot to you and Cord for improving it. Thus yes, please upload it. Gree

[Letsencrypt-devel] Bug#822493: Bug#822493: letsencrypt.sh: config file refers to nonexisting documentation

2016-05-14 Thread Daniel Beyer
I pushed an initial README.Debian to git [1], feedback and/or suggestions are welcome. @Mattia: Sadly I still had to update config.sh, due to wrong file paths mentioned in the comment block. Greetings Daniel [1] https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/letsencrypt/letsencrypt.sh.git/tree/debian

[Letsencrypt-devel] Bug#824270: letsencrypt.sh: Please support migration from (python-)letsencrypt to letsencrypt.sh

2016-05-14 Thread Daniel Beyer
Package: letsencrypt.sh Version: 0.1.0-2 Severity: wishlist As suggested in Bug#822493, it would be a nice feature to have at least some information how to migrate from letsencrypt (the python-based package) to letsencrypt.sh. Even better would be a nice helper script, that automates this on deman

[Letsencrypt-devel] Bug#822493: Bug#822493: letsencrypt.sh: config file refers to nonexisting documentation

2016-05-13 Thread Daniel Beyer
Hi Cord, On Fri, 2016-05-13 at 20:16 +0200, Cord Beermann wrote: > Package: letsencrypt.sh > Version: 0.1.0-2 > Followup-For: Bug #822493 > > Hello, > > I'd also prefer some more information how this package works. > The still missing README.Debian is to blame on me. I'll sit down tomorrow an

[Letsencrypt-devel] Bug#822493: Bug#822493: Bug#822493: letsencrypt.sh: config file refers to nonexisting documentation

2016-04-26 Thread Daniel Beyer
Am Dienstag, den 26.04.2016, 11:27 + schrieb Mattia Rizzolo: > >(...) > > Daniel: do we have something interesting to put in README.Debian? > Otherwise I guess removing the reference for now is a good solution as > any. We could (and should) explain the Debian specific thinks, like where the c

Re: [Letsencrypt-devel] Bug#812174: ITP: letsencrypt-sh -- ACME client implemented in Bash

2016-03-29 Thread Daniel Beyer
Hi Francois Am Sonntag, den 27.03.2016, 10:07 -0700 schrieb Francois Marier: > > On 2016-03-27 at 13:50:43, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: >> (...) > > If this is Ok for the letsencrypt team, would you be ok to add myself > > (user: mattia) and Daniel Beyer (that I guess is dabe