[Letsencrypt-devel] Bug#838527: letsencrypt.sh: Ship nginx snippet

2016-09-21 Thread Elrond
: /etc/nginx/snippets/ The admin then can manually activate it, by adding a "include snippets/letsencrypt.sh-challenge.conf;" in his site's config file. When #822792 is fixed, we will hopefully have a new directory for this and some way on how to activate it. Cheers

[Letsencrypt-devel] Bug#826145: letsencrypt.sh: Ship lighttpd module?

2016-09-07 Thread Elrond
Hi, On Sun, Sep 04, 2016 at 20:23:11 +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > Hi, > > getting back to this getting-old bug... great. > On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 05:01:59PM +0200, Elrond wrote: [...] > > I have filed a debian bug to create a directory for > > snippets that a

[Letsencrypt-devel] Bug#827371: letsencrypt.sh: Use hook.d folder?

2016-08-27 Thread Elrond
On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 15:13:43 +0200, Marc Haber wrote: > On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 08:25:47PM +0200, Elrond wrote: > > If people want to use dns-01 challenges, they need a hook > > script to put the challenge on the DNS server. With one > > global big hook script this

[Letsencrypt-devel] Bug#827371: letsencrypt.sh: Use hook.d folder?

2016-06-15 Thread Elrond
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 16:06:40 +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 02:21:34PM +0200, Elrond wrote: > > I am starting to test hook scripts to deploy the > > certificates into appropiate places. One idea I got while > > doing that: Have a hook.d folder with

[Letsencrypt-devel] Bug#824223: letsencrypt.sh: Provide more automatism for letsencrypt.sh

2016-06-15 Thread Elrond
On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 22:28:30 +0200, Cord Beermann wrote: [...] > That script would also need hooks to reload daemons that need to know > about a certificate-change. [...] Could my hook.d idea in #827371 possibly help with this? Cheers

[Letsencrypt-devel] Bug#827371: letsencrypt.sh: Use hook.d folder?

2016-06-15 Thread Elrond
- Add HOOK="/etc/letsencrypt.sh/run-hookd.sh" to the main config or a conf.d/00-debian.sh. - Create a /etc/letsencrypt.sh/hook.d - I am not entirely sure about the options to run-parts. What do you think? Cheers Elrond run-hookd.sh Description: Bourne sh

[Letsencrypt-devel] Bug#826145: letsencrypt.sh: Ship lighttpd module?

2016-06-14 Thread Elrond
Hi, On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 19:58:55 +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 01:31:29PM +0200, Elrond wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 19:57:23 +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 06:25:48PM +0200, Elrond wrote: > > For nginx (I *mi

[Letsencrypt-devel] Bug#826145: letsencrypt.sh: Ship lighttpd module?

2016-06-10 Thread Elrond
Hi, On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 19:57:23 +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 06:25:48PM +0200, Elrond wrote: > > could you consider to provide the attached file as > > /etc/lighttpd/conf-available/10-letsencrypt.sh-challenge.conf > > Yes! we were wa

[Letsencrypt-devel] Bug#826145: letsencrypt.sh: Ship lighttpd module?

2016-06-02 Thread Elrond
I don't think, it's needed to put this in its own package like the -apache2 one. It's just a file you ship, that wont hurt anyone. Cheers Elrond alias.url += ( "/.well-known/acme-challenge" => "/var/lib/letsencrypt.sh/acme-challenges" )