http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1694
Summary: UTF-8 Nitpicks
Product: Linux From Scratch
Version: SVN
Platform: PC
URL: http://archives.linuxfromscratch.org/mail-archives/lfs-
dev/2006-January/055191.htm
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=446
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=684
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-02 19:54 ---
I reversed the order to find new dependencies. Here's what I've got so far in
addition to the last patch. These are just the show stoppers, i.e. the build
crashes
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=381
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1677
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-01 08:09 ---
Matt, sorry for wrongly relating this error output with this bug. Looks like the
user actually followed our bad advice. But the point made by me on IRC is still
va
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1677
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-01 07:31 ---
Additional output - a user requested help with this.
Looks like the perl component from his toolchain does not like being used on
the new machine.
cd /sources/
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=684
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-31 20:02 ---
And one more...GRUB needs Texinfo
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
--
ht
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=684
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-31 16:40 ---
Found some more dependencies that need to be added...
Bash needs Bash and Texinfo
IPRoute2 needs Bison and Coreutils
Autoconf needs Texinfo
Automake needs Texinfo
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=547
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|expect-5.44.0 |expect-5.44.1
--- Additiona
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=738
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|linux-2.6.15.1 |linux-2.6.15.2
--- Addition
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=684
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-30 15:41 ---
Created an attachment (id=143)
--> (http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/attachment.cgi?id=143&action=view)
ICA verified build order
Chris, sorry for not adding anyth
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=684
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-30 15:39 ---
> Great work on all the ICA testing Dan! I just have a question...I believe the
> ICA testing checks whether the LFS system can reproduce itself flawlessly. Has
> t
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1691
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1690
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-30 12:37 ---
*** Bug 1691 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watch
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1692
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1690
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-30 12:37 ---
*** Bug 1692 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watch
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1690
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-30 12:36 ---
*** Bug 1693 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watch
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1693
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1693
Summary: Coreutils 5.93 installs su.1 manual page
Product: Linux From Scratch
Version: TESTING
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1692
Summary: Coreutils 5.93 installs su.1 manual page
Product: Linux From Scratch
Version: TESTING
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1691
Summary: Coreutils 5.93 installs su.1 manual page
Product: Linux From Scratch
Version: TESTING
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1690
Summary: Coreutils 5.93 installs su.1 manual page
Product: Linux From Scratch
Version: TESTING
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=874
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|udev-083|udev-084
--- Additional Com
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=684
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-29 22:02 ---
Great work on all the ICA testing Dan! I just have a question...I believe the
ICA testing checks whether the LFS system can reproduce itself flawlessly. Has
there b
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=684
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-29 21:55 ---
Chris, you're knocking this one out! I'll add whatever info I have from the ICA
runs tomorrow including the build order currently used. I'm out of time
tonight, t
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1682
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-29 00:35 ---
Autoconf can use emacs
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
You are the QA conta
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=684
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-29 00:04 ---
Adding a little more dependency information...
Findutils needs DejaGNU (for the testsuite)
M4 does NOT need perl (the book currently says it does)
--- You a
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-28 20:54 ---
Just started building a current LFS system with an LFS 3.3 installation (minor
exception being findutils - I used 4.1.20 instead of 4.1 - couldn't find the
patch f
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=547
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=547
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=874
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|udev-082|udev-083
--- Additional Com
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=884
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-26 06:05 ---
Can we mark this as WONTFIX and we'll pick the fix up when upstream do so? It's
been so long now and it doesn't appear to be having any ill effects on our build
me
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=851
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-26 06:02 ---
I don't think this bug is valid any longer. The pre-reqs assume that one can
build a kernel. As for writing a script that parses the config entries, etc.
that's n
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1675
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1675
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1677
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-25 20:37 ---
Yes, but those are only for the current stable book. They aren't needed for the
development book.
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are t
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1675
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-25 16:42 ---
Two that always seems to bite people on lfs-support:
bison
flex
-devel packages. Don't know about versions.
--- You are receiving this mail because:
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1671
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1654
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1689
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1688
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1676
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=874
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|udev-081|udev-082
--- Additional Com
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1689
Summary: Create en_US.UTF-8 locale for coreutils tests
Product: Linux From Scratch
Version: SVN
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Prior
iority: P5
Component: Book
AssignedTo: lfs-book@linuxfromscratch.org
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
QAContact: lfs-book@linuxfromscratch.org
This is a duplicate of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176468
"sort -n" doesn't work in multibyte lo
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1686
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1676
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-24 08:47 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> Heh, my first thought on this was "no, no, definitely not!". However, RPM is
> already mentioned in the BLFS text, so why not change th
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1676
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-24 08:44 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> > (In reply to comment #4)
> > > If we are to follow LSB standards, we need to include RPM.
> > >
> > > http://lsbbook.gforge.freestan
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1676
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-24 08:35 ---
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > If we are to follow LSB standards, we need to include RPM.
> >
> > http://lsbbook.gforge.freestandards.org/package.html#RPM
>
> N
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1676
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-24 08:23 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Well, I wouldn't call it a "good" review, necessarily, but having read it, I
> think the information that is in BLFS is ideally suited t
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1676
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-24 08:13 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> If we move what is in BLFS to LFS, with a good review of the text to make sure
> it fits its placement in LFS, I think we'd be handling
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1676
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-24 08:04 ---
If we are to follow LSB standards, we need to include RPM.
http://lsbbook.gforge.freestandards.org/package.html#RPM
--- You are receiving this mail becaus
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1676
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-24 06:13 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Having re-read the discussion about this, I think that the way we should
> handle
> this is to a) remove the recommendation of the spe
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1676
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-24 05:04 ---
Having re-read the discussion about this, I think that the way we should handle
this is to a) remove the recommendation of the specific package manager we
curren
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1686
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-23 20:42 ---
We gain one less non-working link. Groff 1.18.1.1-10 no longer exists.
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=684
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
OtherBugsDependingO||1682
nThis|
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1682
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
BugsThisDependsOn||684
--- You are receivin
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1682
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-23 15:37 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Now comes the question of whether you should mention all "optional"
> dependencies, or just all the ones that are not listed in LFS. Fo
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1682
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-23 15:22 ---
Shadow can also use cracklib (I know it's already mentioned in the book, but I'm
just adding it to the list).
Now comes the question of whether you should mention
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1682
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-23 15:15 ---
The general consensus on list was that this is a good idea. So, if anyone has
patches that mention particular dependencies I'll gladly accept them. Shadow
will u
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=250
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=210
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1683
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1687
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1686
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-23 13:27 ---
If the only changes are in the way debian builds it, what do we gain from
upgrading? If we don't gain anything, then I'd suggest we mark this as Invalid
or wontfi
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1687
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- You are rec
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1687
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1687
Summary: Error in db-recno.t test after recompile of perl
Product: Linux From Scratch
Version: SVN
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1686
Summary: Groff 1.18.1.1-11
Product: Linux From Scratch
Version: SVN
Platform: PC
URL: http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/groff.html
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1685
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1685
Summary: Groff New Version
Product: Linux From Scratch
Version: SVN
Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Compo
||FIXED
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-17 22:38 ---
This is fixed in r7283, i.e. even before this bug was entered into bugzilla.
Just wait for the book to regenerate.
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1684
Summary: Locale definition file missing?
Product: Linux From Scratch
Version: SVN
Platform: PC
URL: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/development/cha
pter06/gl
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1683
Summary: Install Linux Kernel Documentation
Product: Linux From Scratch
Version: SVN
Platform: PC
URL: http://archives.linuxfromscratch.org/mail-archives/lfs-
dev/200
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1682
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-17 09:46 ---
I think this would be a good idea, although we could simply add this to Bug 684,
which already exists for documenting package dependencies - just add package's
opt
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1682
Summary: RFE: Mentioning optional dependencies
Product: Linux From Scratch
Version: SVN
Platform: PC
URL: http://archives.linuxfromscratch.org/mail-archives/lfs-
dev/
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=874
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|udev-080|udev-081
--- Additional Com
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|man-pages-2.20 |man-pages-2.21
--- Additiona
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=738
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|linux-2.6.15|linux-2.6.15.1
--- Addition
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1681
Summary: Berkeley DB 4.4.20
Product: Linux From Scratch
Version: SVN
Platform: PC
URL: http://dev.sleepycat.com/downloads/latestreleases.html
OS/Version: All
Status:
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=250
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=886
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|iproute2-2.6.14-051107 |iproute2-2.6.15-060110
---
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=874
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|udev-079|udev-080
--- Additional Com
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1676
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-08 09:26 ---
I do agree LFS and BLFS need to be consistent as far as package management, but
I think that what is said in BLFS (no specific package management scheme
recommende
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=886
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|iproute2-051007 |iproute2-2.6.14-051107
Res
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1679
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution||WONTFIX
Status|ASSIGN
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1679
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1679
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-06 13:31 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> that sounds like a major variation from the book, so I suspect you have to
> alter
> a lot more than just this one instruction.
Your s
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1679
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-06 07:12 ---
I'll test this in my current svn build, and I can see that this is more elegant
than using a sed.
But, if you mean that the sources are already extracted on a r
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1679
Summary: bash build with configure options to replace edit
Makefile
Product: Linux From Scratch
Version: 6.1.1
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1677
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-05 10:10 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> You've touched on one of my pet peeves in the current build method, i.e.
> having
> to keep build directories around between chapters 5
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1675
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-05 08:40 ---
> It's patch (-D_GNU_SOURCE)
> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/development/chapter06/patch.html
>
> Also, LFS used to be for more arches (at least PPC).
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1675
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-05 08:35 ---
> > As far as LFS being x86 only, I'd say that is definately not the policy.
> > There is at least one package where the default instructions written in
> > the bo
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1675
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-05 08:25 ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> (In reply to comment #8)
> > As far as LFS being x86 only, I'd say that is definately not the policy.
> > There is at least one package
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1675
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-05 08:13 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> As far as LFS being x86 only, I'd say that is definately not the policy.
> There is at least one package where the default instructions
1 - 100 of 1534 matches
Mail list logo
